Talk:Briarwood, Queens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 29 to May 6 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:

Not particularily notable, unless we want articles on the houses of famous people as well. Falcon 01:24, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep, certainly. Seems plenty notable to me. Everyking 02:10, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. NYC neighborhoods are just as encyclopedic as small Midwestern towns. -Sean 03:39, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Why is this a candidate for speedy deletion? We have an article about every street in London. Why not do one about a neighborhood in NYC?
    • Why would it be? It isn't. Falcon 20:19, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Interesting and noteable.--Samuel J. Howard 12:52, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, in accord with the reasons cited above; and we have a burgeoning list of Queens neighborhoods (including the one I live in, I might add). Alcarillo 20:01, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Decumanus | Talk 04:19, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. There are numerous articles for small towns. Why not for neighborhoods in cities? MK 03:57, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


"Within every neighborhood, there is a hidden star."

End discussion

No evidence or source supporting that this is a way station for Jewish Americans.[edit]

Once primarily a way station for Jewish families on their way to the suburbs, Briarwood is today a very diverse community, with lead fractions of the population being African-Americans (36.6%) and European-Americans (30.2%). It has many Bukharian Jewish, Greek, Hispanic, African American, Albanian, and South American residents. It now has a distinguishable and fast-growing Asian American (14.4%) community as well.[2]

What source or evidence is there supporting this is a way station. I'm not disputing that this is residential nor arguably even suburban. However, this statement leaves the assumption that Jews had come from a place that's not specified? And that they were to a suburb that's unspecified? And why them exclusively. I'll be taking out the first line. Tom173.72.121.29 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Briarwood, Queens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]