Talk:ARC Document Solutions
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Untitled[edit]
Is this anything more than an advertisement? -- Zoe
Made it into a bit less of an ad. --The Cunctator
I am an employee of an ARC company. The editorializing under the "criticism" section is the most company-friendly version of the history of ARC that is available. While I don't have enough time with the company and perspective to know if it's true (and I have never and will never edit this page out of respect of the conflict of interest), the "criticism" section reads as a justification for ARC's business model, rather than an analysis of it. As such it is extremely biased (in the company's favor), and probably not very useful without either a more neutral writing, or an accompanying counterpoint. To suggest that ARC single-handedly saved the reprographics industry is hubris at best. Consolidation was probably inevitable. The article, however, makes it sound as if consolidation specifically by ARC was inevitable, and the savior of the industry. --12.148.54.126 18:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Solutions[edit]
"ARC document solutions provides WP:SOLUTIONS." Of course it does. A loose necktie (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)