Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waste Control Specialist

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 22:38, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Waste Control Specialist[edit]

Tagged for speedy deletion as advertising, but I don't think that's what it is (also not a criterion): "This company has stirred much controversy across the state and the country. The company has recieved much protest from enviromentalists, though it has been welcomed by the citizens in Andrews". Also there seems to be a plan to dump radioactive waste there [1]. No vote. Kappa 08:30, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Doesn't seem like advertising and the information seems pretty valid. --bjwebb 09:32, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think it's advertising as much as it is anti-contextual and a news report. No indication of notability for this particular company (is "Waste Control SpecialisT" the name? odd name for a company). Geogre 14:25, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, especially that huge map. —tregoweth 19:21, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, no usable content. --W(t) 00:52, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
Delete W is right. --Xcali 01:22, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
11.43 million cubic yards of ... waste is inherently notable, for miles around. But delete anyway. Frjwoolley 02:15, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.