Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Rfp)
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    China

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 07:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. El_C 08:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Morgan Jerkins

    Reason: She had some kinda twitter fight with someone who calls himself "DJ Vlad" (RIP Bram Stoker) and said some things that could be interpreted as racist (and insulting to black people who have good music taste). But as long as there are no reliable sources covering this we should probably keep this off of Wikipedia. A flood of IPs will edit this in because internet outrage is a powerful high. Screenshots via Reddit here Polygnotus (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, I'll never get those brain cells back. El_C 08:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Multi-Party Charter

    Temporary protection: repeated deletion of Disputes section by rapidly changing IP. Adakiko (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Generation Alpha

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of unsourced changes by IPs. Some1 (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Josh Cullen (musician)

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Also possibly sockpuppetry, have reported to SPI separately. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Favonian (talk) 15:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Kim Woo-jin

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and newly registered persistent removal of WP:NOTCENSORED content. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High risk being issued for OK today, please protect page for at least 48 hours. BryceM2001 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Yusufzai

    Reason: IP users have came into the page for months on end adding random content. My previous request (here) for a long duration ban was ignored because... ? So these are IPs that have been tampering around for months, perhaps approaching half a year of this now. I request a months long duration ban on IP users, the sole source of the article being messed around. High protection isn't needed but atleast some level of protection is, for a long duration of time as this just happens to be one of those articles that need it. This article literally degrades over time when left alone thanks to these IP users. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 12:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Yeh Hai Chahatein

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks from Entertainment4Reality after named accounts blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Liver King

    Reason: Frequent BLP vio and unconstructive editing Orchastrattor (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Roti canai

    Reason: Persistent disruptive content removal by unregistered user(s). Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Kenosha unrest shooting

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. An IP needs to be blocked for edit warring. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 128.92.27.115 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Not ruling out protection, but currently watching how it plays out. Favonian (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Sony Pictures Animation productions

    Reason: Addition of unsourced content, high level of IP vandalism, and disruptive editing. 216.208.153.194 (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hook (2022 TV series)

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Om Parvat

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Rangiya railway division

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Worcester, England

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Democratic Unionist Party

    Reason: Let's try to give it a shot being open. Completely Random Guy (talk) 07:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't know, I'm seeing on the average one or two reverts per week, fairly consistency since the beginning of this year. That tells me that PCP is just creating more work for reviewers and the protection should be changed to semiprotection instead. Removing PCP isn't going to change the workload (except maybe to avoid having to approve the good edits), but at least it's preventing unconstructive edits from becoming visible. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And I think that pcp may be creating a little more work "behind the scenes", but it also prevents visible disruption in the first place: things simply don't go live. For my part, I am somewhat loath to semi-protect pages which do get not much disruptive traffic, like in this case. After having had my daily read of our protection policy, this is way under the threshold for semi-protection. If an admin wants to semi-protect: be my guest. Lowering protection to none isn't the way to go, though. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done. While I am inclined to replace PCP with semiprotection, based on Lectonar's comment, let's leave it as it is for now. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    ChatGPT

    New URL Change from chat.openai.com to chatgpt.com 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (Not an Admin but...) The main url is chat.openai.com, chatgpt.com redirects you to there. No reason to change it Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    probably an A/B test 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    China

    When I click on the article, it still shows a Semi-Protection on it (even though according when I click on "View History" it shows that it is Extended-Confirmed), can someone please fix this? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – It currently shows the blue "extended confirmed" protection icon. Favonian (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Chef Xavier

    Biography Chefxavier (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – Meaningless request. PS: You should avoid writing about yourself. Favonian (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=1222548220"