User talk:Hemanshu/poster

19:23, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Wikipedia has almost no bureaucracy; one might say it has none at all. But it isn't just the "Wild West." There are social pressures and community norms, but perhaps that by itself doesn't constitute bureaucracy, because anybody can just go in and make any changes they feel like making. And other people generally like it when they do. So there aren't bottlenecks; anyone can come in and make progress on the project at any time. The project is self-policing. Editorial oversight is more or less continuous with writing, which seems, again, very efficient.  :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemanshu (talk • contribs) 20 July 2004

just woundering if this is needed, as in experiance, the bit about there being no bureaucracy dosnt seem to be true, but then, maby ive just become so used to wiki's that buracracy seems to stand out more to me. tooto

Wikipedia has little official bureaucracy, but just as much political nonsense. <_< Octane ^{[improve me]} 01.11.07 1047 (UTC)