Talk:2004–2008 volcanic activity of Mount St. Helens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who moved this?[edit]

Who exactly moved this? I think it was better within the original article.PiccoloNamek 08:37, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)

I did not, but I think this is appropriate in anticipation of upcoming events. User:MPS 132.159.147.77 17:41, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
As do I. The amount of text for this was already more than the 1980 summary in the main St. Helens article when it was moved. The few sentences about this event in the main St. Helens article seem to be appropriate for what will likely just be some more dome building. If this becomes a major eruption, then an appropriately long summary of this article will be placed in the main St. Helens entry. --mav 04:33, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Merge/rename[edit]

I merged in the growing text from the original Mount St. Helens article, so that this article now covers events in 2005 as well. I was unsure about renaming it -- does 2004-2005 volcanic activity of Mount St. Helens make more sense, or 2004-present volcanic activity of Mount St. Helens? Anybody want to chime in? Somebody could also help trim down the text in the base article, which is still longer than that about the 1980 eruption (probably because there wasn't a "main article" flag -- I put one in -- to let poeple know to add stuff here). --Dhartung | Talk 08:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link to seismograph[edit]

http://www.pnsn.org/WEBICORDER/webimaps.html#msh Maybe this link should be added to the list. you can click on the station code on the right of the map, and you'll get real time seismic data from mount st. Helens. AugustinMa 18:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article rename?[edit]

"2004 and later volcanic activity of Mount St. Helens" seem an obsolete article name, now that (as of July 2008) the 2004 eruption has been officially declared over, as of January 2008 ... I think the article should maybe get renamed, then, to "2004-2008 volcanic activity of Mount St. Helens" --Chibiabos (talk) 07:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ninety minutes?[edit]

The article says that on January 16, 2008, "an observatory in Vancouver, Washington recorded a magnitude 2.9 earthquake, followed by a small tremor that lasted nearly ninety minutes". How is that possible? The longest earthquake I have ever heard of lasted 12 minutes, and the reference given links to a Yahoo! search. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't even close to the longest earthquake. Check out Slow earthquake. Some reports I've heard in Washington state have described "slow earthquakes" that have endured for years. --Chibiabos (talk) 07:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 4[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2004–2008_volcanic_activity_of_Mount_St._Helens&oldid=1196465479"