Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kentucky Derby/archive1
Kentucky Derby[edit]
A great horse racing article. Patricknoddy 8:56am May 7, 2005 (EDT)
- Whistleblow. I believe 63.17.137.171 is impersonating Patricknoddy. The time format is even incorrect (see here for an example). Linuxbeak 13:31, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- I've left Patrick a message at User talk:Patricknoddy asking if this was him. Angela. 19:30, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- This isn't Patrick. He hasn't edited in about a month. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 19:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- In lite of the above comments, Motion to nulifiy current vote and motion to investigate suspected user. Linuxbeak 02:46, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Patrick said on my talk page that the nomination was by him. Angela. 21:24, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
- In lite of the above comments, Motion to nulifiy current vote and motion to investigate suspected user. Linuxbeak 02:46, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
- This isn't Patrick. He hasn't edited in about a month. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 19:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- I've left Patrick a message at User talk:Patricknoddy asking if this was him. Angela. 19:30, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Object, regardless of who wrote it. Not expansive enough: 70% of the article is the list of winners (and too many of them are red links).
plattopustalk 17:46, May 7, 2005 (UTC) - Object. Nine paragraphs, plus a few floating sentences, on a 130 year old race appears to be very brief to me. Let alone the fact that there are no references. As Plattopus says: this article is far from Featured Article standard whoever nominated it. Rje 23:46, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Object. Kentucky Derby *should* be a FAC, by the subject, but the page itself is disappointing. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 19:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
