Talk:Blender (Collective Soul album)

from VfD:

I don't feel that this notable enough to warrant its own page. It should perhaps be deleted and the contents merged into a page dedicated to the band. See also Dosage. TigerShark 21:29, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. It seems notable enough to me, as Collective Soul is a pretty famous band. Gets more than 8000 google hits. The album also includes Elton John on one track, which signicantly ups its notability IMO. Tuf-Kat 22:23, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I'm not one who thinks absolutely every recording known to man needs its own article, but this is a fairly major one by a fairly major artist. Starblind 22:47, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Also same with Dosage. They aren't orphaned pages, but linking to the main bands page via the nav box. Agreed they could have more information about the album, but it is stubbed after all. Inter 22:51, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I agree with the previous entries, although I do note that I am biased given that I did start the article. PlasticBeat 23:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep albums articles by notable bands. RickK 23:18, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• A major-label, full-length, original release by an internationally famous rock band. Keep. Samaritan 00:39, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep -- DCEdwards1966 01:01, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Delete, marginal notability. I'm still not convinced that a stub like this deserves its own article. Megan1967 03:53, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable album by notable band. Hope to add further info over weekend. Capitalistroadster 10:26, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree with Tuf-Kat. JuntungWu 13:06, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, obviously. GRider\^talk 23:40, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Fair use rationale for Image:Collectivesoulblender.jpg

Image:Collectivesoulblender.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Collectivesoulblender.jpg

Image:Collectivesoulblender.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)