Talk:Packet analyzer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs a solution to prevent packet sniffers getting in a network.[edit]

Self explanatory, really.

Dead link[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 04:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dead link[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 04:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Adding appropriate banners[edit]

Wanted to add something like these: {{WikiProject Internet}} {{WikiProject Software}} Both seem to be relevant to the topic of the article concerned. 88.105.37.22 (talk) 09:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Normally these things are added by members of the respective WikiProject. ~Kvng (talk) 17:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Packet capture[edit]

Packet capture does not appear to be a separate topic from Packet analyzer. All the independent references given in Packet capture also talk about analysis. -—Kvng 14:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merged in 2013 ~Kvng (talk) 17:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of Trinity College Dublin study report, RSN discussion[edit]

FYI, Reliability of the following sources in this article are being discussed at RSN.[1] More opinions are welcome. Also suggest seeing the update/correction at The Register.[2]

  • "Study reveals scale of data-sharing from Android mobile phones". Trinity College Dublin. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  • Liu, Haoyu; Patras, Paul; Leith, Douglas J. (October 6, 2021). "Android Mobile OS Snooping By Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei and Realme Handsets" (PDF). Retrieved November 16, 2021.

-- Yae4 (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]