Talk:Destroyer (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shoegaze[edit]

Is shoegaze really cited as one of Dan's influences? His stuff is way more hooky, melodic, and generally creative and a joy to listen to as well flat out different, since it's not overtly atonal, if compared to shoegaze favorites like My Bloody Valentine, Slowdive, Lush, etc. Anyway, it's cool to see an article building up on Destroyer. I think I'll try and add an interview link as well as some information on past tours and how Dan is not into touring... ~ May 19th 2005 Haruki

I got that from here --Tydaj 20:02, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Year of birth[edit]

I don't know how old Dan Bejar is, but I am guessing he was not born in 1982? That would have made him like 13 when Destroyer put their first album out. --Cwage 23:19, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IPA[edit]

I changed the IPA for his name. The last consonant was transcribed as a voiced uvular fricative. This is highly unlikely for a Vancouver native of (presumed) Hispanic descent. This phoneme is present in almost no English dialect (save some rural areas in the south of England and some (mostly older) Jewish people who retained this phoneme from Yiddish). It is not even present in Canadian French (français québécois). I replaced it with a voiced alveolar approximant. This is how most English speakers (especially from the US and Canada) pronounce their 'r's. 69.209.226.170 23:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I always get those two confused. --Tydaj 01:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

destroyer discography[edit]

It should include this record: 1950: Soul Junk url=http://www.amazon.ca/1950-Soul-Junk-Destroyer/dp/B00005CENP/ref=sr_1_5/702-4506924-7648866?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1189158199&sr=1-5]. I edited it once, but someone removed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.burl (talkcontribs) 09:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's Streethawk. There's no destroyer album by that name. A search for [1950 soul junk] reveals that it's probably a Christian hip-hop act. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.194.235 (talk) 07:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split Article[edit]

Given that Bejar now has a fourth (?) collaboration, Hello, Blue Roses, I think it's probably best if Bejar has his own page, separate from that of 'Destroyer' (yes, even though he is Destroyer). For Dan Bejar to redirect to the page on the band Destroyer leaves out a lot of his actual biography, his collaborations. -- Chabuk T • C ] 03:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.Grzond (talk) 22:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definately Agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.245.227.160 (talk) 01:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Just look at Britt Daniel and Drake Tungsten (Britt's solo pseudonym) for another example.(Fulmerg (talk) 20:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

File:Destroyer at Sudoeste 2011 by Sander Bakkes.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Destroyer at Sudoeste 2011 by Sander Bakkes.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 9 June 2014[edit]

Wanted to remove notice on top of page indicating that more citations were needed. The reason is that I have thoroughly added citations to every statement in the article about this musician. Thank you.

Almostds (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{!}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Request moved and checkY done. Thanks for your work, Almostds, and feel free to remove maintainance templates yourself next time if you are convinced that they are not needed anymore -- there is no official process to add or remove them. :)
    Amalthea 09:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Destroyer (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Destroyer (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]