Talk:Lalita Sahasranama
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lalita Sahasranama article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of Chaturbahu Samanvita, Chidagnikunda Sambhuta, Devakarya samudyata, Ragasvarupa Pashadhya, Shri Maharajni, Shri Mata and Shrimat Simhasaneshwari were merged into Lalita sahasranama. Those pages now redirect here. The old talk-pages of Talk:Chaturbahu Samanvita, Talk:Chidagnikunda Sambhuta, Talk:Devakarya samudyata, Talk:Shri Maharajni and Talk:Shrimat Simhasaneshwari are empty; for talk pages of Ragasvarupa Pashadhya and Shri Mata, see Talk:Ragasvarupa Pashadhya and Talk:Shri Mata. |
Article Title[edit]
It's called LALITA Sahasranama. I know, Lalitha is pretty common on the internet... Writing 'th' for 't' just seems to be a VERY popular mistake among Indians. (One other example of this: anantha, instead of ananta ('un-ending'): 66.000 hits...)
- Well, actually its a common mistake among southern Indians, not northerners. I should know, my (southern) name contains a mistaken 'th' as well (I blame my parents). Anyway, I propose a rename to Lalita. Imc 21:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- I am indeed from South India, so maybe I'm simply biased, but I seem to prefer the Lalitha spelling over Lalita, in order to emphasize that it is a soft 't' and not a hard one (i.e not the 't' in Tomato, but more like the 't' in "the"). Anyway, I suppose it is simply a matter of opinion and of little consequence if you know the proper pronunciation. Adityan 03:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Please don't add entire Lalitha Sahasranamam text[edit]
This is a wikipedia article not a book. If some editor has original full text and translations he is free to use wikisource. Thanks rams81 (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Copy Edit Notes[edit]
I edited this article as much as I could with eliminating content. Corrected spelling, grammar etc. Montykillies (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 | Guild of Copy Editors | |||
| ||||
Montykillies (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lalita Sahasranama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140317010626/http://rasikas.org/wiki/Lalitha_Sahasranamam to http://rasikas.org/wiki/Lalitha_Sahasranamam
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)