Talk:Two wrongs don't make a right (adage)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See also logical fallacies.

The assertion that any particular philosophiacl conclusion is fallacious, is a POV and should be attributed -- not labelled a fallacy! --Uncle Ed 21:29, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)


I don't think the Sep11-example does help anyone in this particular article. I therefore would like to see it removed.

The title "Two wrongs don't make a right" is not ambiguous with any other Wikipedia article, so this article does not require disambiguation. I have moved the article accordingly.
Er, nevermind. Nohat 04:09, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


I concur in the 9/11 example not being useful, because a policy of trying to negotiate with hijackers/for aircrew: to accede to their demands is typically grounded in trying for the best outcome for the hijackees, 'not' in a "two wrongs do not make a right" ethical objection against excessive self defence Tschild 20:16, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Two_wrongs_don%27t_make_a_right_(adage)&oldid=21015211"