Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capt Thomas J Lee

Wikipedia is not a genealogy site. --jpgordon{gab} 04:53, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Non notable. Bad title, too. Rick K 05:18, Nov 23, 2004 (UTC)
DELETE Why is this even recommended for cleanup? --ExplorerCDT 05:51, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
DELETE Of no educational value. User:Marine 69-71
Delete. jni 08:11, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. AtonX 12:56, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete: In the south, everyone is "related to Robert E. Lee" and everyone is "part Indian." This article is true genealogy. Probably a mistaken assumption about Wikipedia by the author. Geogre 14:41, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) (Not related to Robert E. Lee, and only 1/32nd Indian.)
Delete; Wikipedia is not a genealogy site. I think this material would be OK for a user page if the contributor wanted to create an account, but it is not appropriate as an encyclopedia article in the main namespace. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 02:33, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Delete. This looks like first-person original research. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:08, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk)]] 06:23, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
Delete Bart133 16:54, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)