Talk:Banned in Boston

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Boston Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Banned in Boston appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that items which were "Banned in Boston" (i.e. censored) came to be seen as more sexy and attractive elsewhere?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/July.

Wikipedia

Bias in Wikipedia articles[edit]

Anyone wishing to study bias in a wikipedia article can start right here.

Whitman[edit]

Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass is said to have been banned in Boston.

Rlquall 22:31, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Was it or wasnt it? Facts, please! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:6145:5100:4D84:304A:A8E9:EA19 (talk) 01:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia section[edit]

If there was ever a wiki page that needed a trivia/popular culture section, it's this one. 64.131.243.239 16:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Examples would be useful, but see Wikipedia:Trivia sections. -- Beland (talk) 03:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's an episode of the TV Series MASH in which Hawkeye his cohorts try to get ahold of a film which was "banned in Boston." Supposedly about an "unsatisfied virgin" they thought they were going to get a blue movie. Maj. Charles Winchester (from Boston) warned them not to get their hopes up saying that Boston "would ban Pinnochio." When they finally get the film, it turns out to be a boring potboiler that Boston banned simply because an actress says the word "virgin." Yanqui9 (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the film in question was "The Moon is Blue", which was far from a potboiler. It was nominated for some Academy Awards, and won a few others. The swamp rats found it boring because they were expecting some lurid skin flick. Wschart (talk) 13:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"public exhibitions of sex"[edit]

From the HISTORY section: "Boston was founded by Puritans in the early 17th century. Puritans held highly negative views regarding public exhibitions of sex. "

What is the second sentence intended to mean? That Puritans frowned upon sexual intercourse in public?

Wanderer57 (talk) 21:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boston: de facto or de iure theocracy?[edit]

Was Boston a "de iure" theocracy (as written in the text), or rather a "de facto" theocracy? -- megA (talk) 20:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]