Talk:US-A

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RTGs[edit]

The article on Radioisotope thermoelectric generators (rtgs) mentions that 2 rorsats had problems that caused their reactor to deorbit. One is obviously Cosmos 954, but what's the other one? Anyone know? Whe should find this out and add it here, and some of the content on the RTG page should be migrated here. -Lommer 18:51, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The RTGs article was incorrect because RORSATS did not use RTGs. I have corrected the article and expanded this one. Bobbis 23:23, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Other concerns[edit]

Reference is made to 'BUK' reactors. What are they? LorenzoB 18:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bouk were a reactor type manufactured by Krasnaya Zvezda for space operations, along with Topaz mentioned elsewhere in the article. I do not know whether or where they flew. 79.65.134.227 (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the total number of RORSATs deployed? LorenzoB 18:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, the article does not seem to say, and would be improved if it had this detail known and sourced? I wonder if the Russian government has ever released this info from this Soviet program? or if the US CIA or USAF programs that track satellites ever publically released such numbers? N2e (talk) 12:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article name[edit]

If the satellites are named Upravlyaemy Sputnik Aktivnyj, why is the Wikipedia article named with an esoteric acronym "US-A"?

Seems that, per WP:COMMONNAME, the article ought not to be named the unrecognizable "US-A", and just be named Upravlyaemy Sputnik Aktivnyj or whatever name it is referred to in English in ordinary human use. N2e (talk) 12:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on US-A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]