Talk:Inner Mongolian People's Party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of an educational assignment at University at Albany, SUNY supported by WikiProject Military history and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term that ended on December 2011. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 15:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

disputed[edit]

There is a dispute between two versions. To see the other version: [1], to compare: [2]

  — Instantnood 03:54, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

What exactly is the dispute? siafu 05:17, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Failure of notability[edit]

This article seems to make no assertion of notability. This "secessionist movement" seems to have no presence beyond a website. The only other reference cited in the article relates to statistics unrelated to the movement per se. Could the original contributors please supply third party sources or any other indication of notability please? Otherwise I will put the article up for deletion. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 11:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree AAAAA143222 (talk) 21:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't hey want to reunite with Outer Mongolia?[edit]

Reunification seems as a good alternative as at least the number of countries in the world would stay the same. Maybe they just want to make geography harder for students. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.102.91 (talk) 20:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

The party is mentioned briefly here and here. It seems the group is at least notable enough for PRC authorities to ignore their own citizenship laws over it. It should be noted, however, that the imaginary party of the same name from the 1960s (whose alleged existence seems to have been the pretext for a large-scale ethnic persecution in Inner Mongolia) has probably slightly more coverage in print than the subject of this article. Same might be true for earlier existing groups of the same or similar names. Yaan (talk) 13:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The UNHCR link is less than satisfactory, because as you said, the mention is passing: there was a quote from a Mongol dissident who was detained for his return after student activities in the 1980s. It sounds like he was trying to get more publicity for his unknown party. The Guardian is more interesting since it gives it a paragraph or two, however, all that is said about the party is that they can make scathing press releases from the internet. To cover the IMPP as if it is an active dissident party, instead of just a website created by an exile that caters to outsiders, is fundamentally misleading.
This article could be refashioned into one about the imaginary 1960s party, with the attempt at materializing it (the subject of this article at present) a sidenote. Splittist (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the amnesty international statement about Mr. Jaranbayar Soyolt's release makes it sound as if the official reason for his detention had nothing to do with his activities in the 1980s and everything with his activities later-on. Here is yet another article that deals with the party to some degree. Here is a long article in Mongolian, though I guess it might be somewhat press release-like.
The non-existent party of the 1960s is a different topic and also was given a slightly different name, so IMHO what you propose would better be done in a separate article. If you believe the subject of this particular article is not notable enough on its own, I propose you nominate it at AfD. My impression is that "Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability." from WP:ORG speaks for the notability of this article's subject. Yaan (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Inner Mongolian People's Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Inner Mongolian People's Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]