Talk:Cleanliness

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cleanliness article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

123.201.56.114 (talk) 19:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)==Olden times== Cleanliness is very important. But you should talk about cleanliness now and cleanliness back in the time of wagons and horses.You know, the time of pioneers. -- ewerwrwerwerw209.50.156.185[reply]

Strange[edit]

This is a very strange page... =) I was looking for how to insert a {cleanup} tag to pages and I'm redirected to here. I'm deleting the 'cleanup' redirect because it doesn't seem to apply to the page. Dept of Alchemy 20:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to admit...this page is really quite amusing as it stands now. Sort of an instructional piece based on the assumption that someone reading might not have come across the concept. --Kukini 04:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanliness is next to Godliness[edit]

I wish some one would add a paragraph about this on the article. I found a reference in http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/5/messages/1209.html but since English is not my main language I feel someone else may be better for the task. Itzcuauhtli (talk) 14:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We probably need to be in contact with Cleaning Specialist Joe Atkins (of akcess) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atcess (talk • contribs) 07:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad redirect[edit]

Removing redirect from Squalidness to here, as it's rather silly... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.53.78.141 (talk) 14:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gulp[edit]

Hard to know where to start on this. There are abundant sources that deal with the cultural concept of "cleanliness", as any Google Books search with reasonable parameters will indicate. Would there be objections if I gutted this to the intro and the section on Industry? The rest is mostly how-to, and a desire to impose a particular set of criteria for cleanliness, all having to do with hygiene and housekeeping, and not the subject of "cleanliness". The article could benefit immensely from globalizing, and from adding a section on the history of cleanliness, which (I learned this morning looking for sources to improve the intro) is a far more fascinating topic than one might imagine. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:38, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since I've gotten no response, 'm going to proceed with edits intended to narrow the scope of the article to "cleanliness," rather than "hygiene" or "housekeeping". Am mainly deleting the "how-to" sections for now. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanliness — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.206.97 (talk) 01:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC) asdfghjkahsahjbjhdbanmjhsdfd↓df∞sd¶¶¶¶¶¶∞∞∞◌◌™™™™⟨dsfgs₵₳฿₯₠⟩sdfs‹dsdfdg‹s‹s‹d‹‹‹‹‹d‹d‹d‹‹‹‹‹d‹‹d‹‹«««««««««Italic text»»»»»»»»»››››››››››››››››››››[reply]

"Clenliness"[edit]

I've come across that spelling in quite a few newspaper articles, books etc. Is it a real word? Maybe some simplified form? Or were all the writers just bad at orthography? If it's a real alternative spelling (or considered common enough a mistake), can somebody add a redirect from there to here? --77.190.30.96 (talk) 19:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hpe[edit]

Hygiene 163.47.148.225 (talk) 14:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Cleanliness[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Cleanliness's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Ferguson2013":

From Hygiene in Christianity: Ferguson, Everett (2013). Encyclopedia of Early Christianity: Second Edition. Routledge. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-136-61158-2.
From Lavabo: Ferguson, Everett (8 October 2013). Encyclopedia of Early Christianity: Second Edition. Routledge. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-136-61158-2.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]