Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name(s)[edit]

OK, there's one piece of information that this page could really do with: WTF does "POI" mean? acronymfinder has various suggestions, but none of them seem very likely to me. And for some reason, there appears to be no explanation on the project page itself. So, anyone have any ideas? - IMSoP 17:56, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I had to write the authors for this. They removed the explanations from the web pages for marketing reasons (apparently it is now used in a lot of large financial companies so the silly names didn't work)

POI stands in this case for "Poor Obfuscation Implementation" - apparently the authors could find no other reason for the file format to be structured the way it is other than to obfuscate it. Furthermore, the authors managed to crack it so they felt it was a "poor implementation" of obfuscation at that. The other APIs under the project are also similarly named: Horrible SpreadSheet Format (HSSF), Horrible Word Processor Format (HWPF) and Horrible Property Set Format (HPSF). - Reboot

Wow, good research! Given that all official documents have been purged of this, I've added a note that is the origin of the name, and removed the statement implying it is the name. Obvously, we don't have to slavishly follow their squeamishness, but it seems pretty clear to me that "POI" is now the official name, and this is just another example of a name that was an acronym once. I've also added the explanation of why they were removed, since it's an interesting fact in its own right. - IMSoP 18:35, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Here is an old version of the POI site: http://web.archive.org/web/20041015142404/http://www.coyotesong.com/poi/ -Reboot

Seems like it's worth noting that they haven't expunged any rude remarks from their API docs:

http://poi.apache.org/apidocs/overview-summary.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.98.83.235 (talk) 15:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HSSF not a very robust utility ?[edit]

I removed the comment on HSSF utility which was said to be Not a very robust utility and is notoriously finicky. First, it was not ^{[citation needed]}-based and seemed as Original Research to me. Second, we use at work POI 3.0 Alpha 1 for one year now to read Excel files generated by both EXCEL 8.0 and 11.0 (and parse their content) and write them back after modifications, and we never had any problems, even when specific fonts, foreground and background colors, and alignment stuff are used in the cells. Hervegirod 10:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HSSF/POI is a cursed name at my company. It's seen as a necessary evil. Haven't used 3.0 Alpha 1 much, but a lot of times it would refuse to open the Excel file and you'd have to do stuff like make spaces in a blank cell, save it, and then clear the spaces and save it again. Also, as far as I know, it still won't open files with charts or filters. 209.2.118.14 (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What version do you use ? You really should try 3.0.2, it is even able to write EXCEL files with formulas. I think EXCEL support has improved a lot since 3.0. However I did not try to read EXCEL files with charts or filters. Hervegirod (talk) 11:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jakarta POI Logo.gif[edit]

Image:Jakarta POI Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More fun facts[edit]

When I used to give talks on the project / APIs, I sometimes brought in actual poi. . It was disgusting and stank my dishwasher/dishes up for days. I stopped mainly because my wife really didn't like all of our dishes smelling disgusting. Andrew C. Oliver (founder) ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.147.199.228 (talk) 03:04, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

XWPF support[edit]

According to http://poi.apache.org/hwpf/index.html there is a component XWPF available to support Word docx files. The article might be updated to describe the current state of development for reading docx files.