Talk:The Beiderbecke Affair

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal The Beiderbecke Affair is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Removed as POV:

[T]he series have a warm feel, like a favourite old cardigan, which belies the sharpness of the writing.

Lee M 20:09, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Cubs[edit]

This links to Cub Scouts (Boy Scouts of America)- I don't think this is correct. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 02:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC) I've improved it to point at the more general Cub Scout. -- Nick Watts 14:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The-Beiderbecke-Affair-book.jpg[edit]

Image:The-Beiderbecke-Affair-book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copied entry?[edit]

Is the text in the entry copy/pasted from the IMDB entry synopsis, or is it the other way around? How can one tell? 203.211.72.105 (talk) 08:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like much of it was copied from the IMDb plot summary. But I wrote that IMDb plot summary and I have no objection to it being used here as well -- SteveCrook (talk) 05:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big Al & Little Norm[edit]

Are they really brothers (siblings)? Or are they just "brothers" in the sense of "All men are my brothers"? Is it right to call their enterprise a "family business"? -- SteveCrook (talk) 07:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are not literal brothers. This is made clear in the programs. I added an explainer for this a few days ago, then saw your question here later, so am responding here as well Mikeholden (talk) 02:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is Big Al neurotic?[edit]

A recent change to the article pointed out to me the description of Big Al as neurotic. Neurotic? Eccentric, anti-authoritarian, yes and also many other things. But I don't see him as neurotic -- SteveCrook (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Ash Road.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]