Talk:Chaos magic

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chaos magic article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Chaos magic was nominated as a Philosophy and religion good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 17, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Occult Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments post-QF[edit]

@Skyerise: These reasons to quickfail are at the same time obvious and pretty superficial, and had already been identified on the talk page. I only regret that I hadn't done more myself sooner. I'm confident that this can become a good article in due course. —Alalch E. 20:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed the uncited sources and further reading issues... Skyerise (talk) 20:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The techniques articles themselves need to be improved, so that they may be better summarized here. —Alalch E. 20:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]