Talk:WIL WHEATON dot NET

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For a 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/WIL_WHEATON_dot_NET


It's cool that Wil touted Wikipedia on his web site! -- Zoe

  • Because I have nothing better to do, I search for what the above article was talking about, and sure enough, I found it --Raul654 00:37, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)


http://soapbox.wilwheaton.net/ claims that it only has about 2,500 registered users. Morwen 17:12, Dec 20, 2003 (UTC)

Thank you for verifying.

sheesh get a life. It's fucking wesley we are talking about here!

Why was this moved? Was there any reasoning behind it? -Branddobbe 02:11, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)

VFD[edit]

User:Bloghate marked this article for vfd, but failed to create a new vfd page for it within a 12 hour period, so I am removing the vfd tag. He is welcome to re-add the tag if he creates a proper vfd voting page for it and follows the Wikipedia:Deletion process. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 16:19, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Capitals?[edit]

Is there a reason the page title is in all caps?

That is the actual capitalization of the titlebar seen when you visit the blog. B7T 11:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger?[edit]

Someone has proposed merging this article with the larger Wil Wheaton article. I would agree. The site's sole reason for existence is Wil Wheaton, and the blog is, in turn, responsible for much of his current fame now that he has become predominantly a writer who occasionally does work as an actor. (A merger would also make the use of the ALL CAPS less of an issue, given that as an article title it almost seems as if people are being fans — even though it is the way the title appears on the blog — whereas having a section heading be written that way won't seem quite so out of place.) Lawikitejana (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]