Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayed

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 20:12, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Gayed[edit]

Spurious/offensive/badly written content created by serial vandal

Unsigned nomination by User:Dave.Dunford, 11:07, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless someone credible and/or sourced rewrites this about a legitimate use. Samaritan 13:55, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even legitimate uses of the word (which does exist, but doesn't mean this) could only ever be Wiktionary entries. Bearcat 17:58, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with extreme prejudice. Exploding Boy 23:05, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
Delete - not legit. -CunningLinguist 23:39, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this seems to be some kind of joke Stancel 23:47, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonsense. Megan1967 03:52, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Leekage?" Are we talking about anal sex or shopping for vegetables? -Seth Mahoney 08:57, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, quickly. This is an embarassment. Ec5618 17:35, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --Spinboy 19:14, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neologism. Jonathunder 13:09, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
Delete now. I need a shower. Whig 07:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Homophobic idiocy. Pacian 07:58, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.