Talk:Narwhal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateNarwhal is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleNarwhal has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2014Good article nomineeListed
January 28, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
February 24, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 20, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
March 31, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

WP:CETA capitalisation discussion[edit]


Male fighting[edit]

Narwhals have been known to use their tusks as a defensive weapon as well. Even though the tusk is not the toughest found in the animal kingdom the narwhal uses it as a sword or spear when fighting with threats to their group. Many of the males have been found with large gashes on their heads along with pieces of tusks found lodged in the front of their skull that have been left behind from vicious fights they had endured. This has lead researchers to believe that the narwhals fight amongst one another for a variety of reasons including territory defense and displays of dominance.

[1]

References

  1. ^ Gerson, Helen B., and John P. Hickie. 1985 "Head Scarring on Male Narwhals (Monodon monoceros): Evidence for Aggressive Tusk Use." Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 2083-087.

Medium size[edit]

What the heck is a "medium-sized" toothed whale? What is this supposed to mean? Given that an adult male sperm whale can weigh 130,000 pounds, how is 3,500 pounds "medium-sized"? It seems rather compact to me!

Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2023[edit]

if i could edit stuff because i found a few misspellings Farrahgene (talk) 09:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Compassionate727 (T·C) 10:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Length of females contradiction[edit]

"Total length in both sexes, excluding the tusk of the male, can range from 3.95 to 5.5 m (13 to 18 ft). Males, at an average length of 4.1 m (13.5 ft), are slightly larger than females, with an average length of 3.5 m (11.5 ft)."

So the length of females can range from 3.95 to 5.5 m (13 to 18 ft), but their average length is 3.5 m (11.5 ft), out of the range, which is mathematically impossible. Something should be fixed. 213.197.78.255 (talk) 11:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of the tusk[edit]

I wanted to reformat the paragraph that discusses possible uses of the tusk by listing the theories as bullet points. This edit was quickly reverted. I wanted to draw attention to the phrase "The purpose of the narwhal tusk is a topic of constant debate." and show some of these theories (that may or may not be mutually exclusive) in a more reader-friendly format. Zachs81 (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please bring your ideas to the FAC I'll be nominating shortly. 20 upper (talk) 06:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems to be completely controlled by one user[edit]

If you look at the edit history, one user is making all the edits. This can be cross-referenced with the pad lock symbol in the upper corner of the article, letting you know the article is being controlled by specific power-users. It is completely unacceptable and against the spirit of Wikipedia. 203.219.65.139 (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. One particular editor has taken on the job of bringing the article to (I assume) GA or FA status, starting January of this year. The padlock shows that the article is locked for editing by editors who are not WP:AUTOCONFIRMED, to prevent vandalism - a trivial barrier to surmount. Anyone with a minimum of a track record can help edit the text. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NY Times: Why Do Whales Go Through Menopause?[edit]

@Wolverine XI I'm sorry the FAC didn't go as well as you hoped. If you decide to make another attempt, I would suggest putting it back on WP:PR and please ping me when you do and I'll be happy to give you whatever help I can.

I saw this article in today's NY Times. Thought you might find it interesting, and possibly useful to add to the article. Please note that's a time-limited URL to bypass the NY Times paywall; it's good for 30 days. RoySmith (talk) 23:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith: Thank you. I began a peer review just two weeks ago. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 08:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

reference to Jules Verne's novel 'Twenty Thousand...' missing[edit]

In the Wikipedia article on Jules Verne's novel 'Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas', it is mentioned that the narwhal plays a role in the plot, but in this article on the narwhal, no ping-back to that other article is made. It seems to me that such a ping-back ought to be made. Kontribuanto (talk) 17:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas says in the plot section is "mysterious sea monster, which, it is later suggested, might be a gigantic narwhal." Thus the narwhal is not really an important part of the plot and it's not sourced. Too many Wikipedia articles include "In popular culture" sections that are noting more than trivia. I would oppose adding this. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how that would help the article as a whole. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 04:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]