Talk:Four Knights Game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Todo[edit]

  • List some players who have used the Four Knights.
  • Mention following variations and create appropriate redirects to Four Knights Game:
    • Metger unpin in symmetrical (classical) variation
    • Rubinstein variation/defense
    • Belgrade Gambit
  • Possibly add a discussion of symmetry in classical variation including examining when Black can and should break symmetry. Fine has a good discussion of this in "Ideas Behind the Chess Openings", and I think it's still valid today.
    • Belgrade Gambit 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Nb4 (possible Be7/Nxd5/Nxe4) 6. Nxd4 (Bc4 Nd4!?) unclear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChessCreator (talkcontribs) 15:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The Rubenstein variation - (6.f4 Nxb5 7.Nxb5 d6) should be expanded as there is a potential trap here - 8. Nf3 Qxe4+ 9. Qe2 Qxe2+ 10. Kxe2 then if the 10th move by Black doesn't defend the c7 square (e.g. Nd5) then 11. Nxc7+ forking the king and rook - disaster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.1.137 (talk) 20:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is wikipedia, go hit the edit button. ChessCreator (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4.Bb5 Bb4[edit]

Ain't that variation called the double Ruy Lopez, code C49 on the ECO? maybe that should be added to the article. 201.185.135.186 (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)jparada201.185.135.186 (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Four Knights Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]