This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article will surely be voted for deletion in its current form as being "dictdef" and moved the Wikidictionary. If you want to keep/preserve it from the blood hounds, I suggest expanding and making it less dictionary-like and more encyclopedic. We need the article so I encourge, I do not know myself to help. Stbalbach 15:08, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The easiest way to help expand such an article is to add the {{stub}} template to the bottom, as I have done here. I also added a bit more from the 1911 Britannica to the Law section. JHCC 16:10, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
