Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irwin Altman 172

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 21:52, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Irwin Altman 172[edit]

A badly made page claiming to be the wiki for this school.

  • delete BigFatDave 22:33, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: If it is a wiki for a school, then I think its a really cool idea. Is WP the right venue for such a project? Or should they set up somewhere else? Paradiso 00:11, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • They should really set it up on a userpage rather than having it as an article. Megan1967 00:37, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia is not a hosting service. Does the school not have its own web site, or computers of its own that it can run the MediaWiki software on? Uncle G 00:48, 2005 Apr 1 (UTC)
    • Comment: The school does has its own student-run website --BaronLarf 02:25, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
        • comment I have looked at the student-run site, and it does not say good things about the skill or reliability of said students. Months out-of-date, frontpage plauged by broken links, that site needs help. The group of students in question should make their own site respectable before spawning something on WP. BigFatDave 21:14, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, do not userfy, per WP:WIN. Suggest someone explain this to the article's author if possible. Probably kids created the page without understanding policy, and should not be bitten. Barno 14:37, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • DELETE, but don't ban them.
    • No one is suggesting to ban them! They can put all the stuff about themselves on their Userpage, if they decide to create one. Paradiso 14:36, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Honestly, look at it! Jayjg (talk) 01:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. I've re-started the article as a proper stub. It has encyclopedic potential. --BaronLarf 02:23, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. All schools are notable enough for a truly great encyclopaedia. —RaD Man (talk) 02:37, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. School vanity. Not notable, so no possibility to become encyclopedic. Jonathunder 03:07, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's a middle school. It's in New York City. What more is there to say about it without descending to the level of trivia like the current "statistics" section? --Carnildo 03:38, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nonencyclopedic vanity. --Angr/(comhrá) 08:57, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - As with all schools, I vote to keep. --Irishpunktom\talk 11:12, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. A not-particularly notable Lawnguyland middle school. --Calton | Talk 00:31, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. Noisy | Talk 10:36, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Remember that Wikipedia is not paper. Dan100 20:29, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Schools are noteworthy. --Zantastik 07:01, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Two sentences about a middle school and a plethora of external links don't even merit a merge. If there's anything worth saying about this school, this won't help. —Korath (Talk) 08:13, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, useless as hell. Grue 09:14, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. As written it is a directory entry, not an encyclopedia entry. WP is not a directory of schools or anything else. Gamaliel 14:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep this pls Yuckfoo 17:34, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Every school is notable, each and everyone. Klonimus 20:59, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's frustrating that keep-every-school supporters are reduced to Duckspeak instead of judging each article individually. -- Dcfleck 03:33, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand this school article. Notability is subjective. I don't think the wiki is harmed by having an article about every verifiable small school that someone wants to write an article about. If a person from Irwin Altman Middle School 172 finds this poorly written stub, maybe they'll expand it. If the article is deleted, that won't happen. I don't see any reason this should be deleted beyond "because it's a school". ~leif ☺ HELO 19:12, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete There is no reason why a minor middle school should be in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place for personal school pages, nor is it a directory for schools. NeevaN 19:16, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Agree with NeevaN. The JPS 10:52, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Irwin_Altman_172&oldid=1039426951"