User talk:192.31.106.34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (192.31.106.34) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 17:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings[edit]

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

October 2004[edit]

Knock off the incorrect changes to the Bush article, or you may be blocked from editing here. Pakaran. 13:47, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

June 2005[edit]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Nadavspi | talk 00:03, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi. Please cite a source to verify the change in death date. I undid your changes to that effect, for now. Thanks. Regards, El_C 00:04, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2 February 2006[edit]

Regarding your edits to Furniture. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

17 April 2006[edit]

Your change to the page Sigma was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. ••\\/\//esleyPinkha//\/\\•• 22:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Bayesian model comparison on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 1568 15:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Wafulz 16:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

editing wikipedia[edit]

Hi,

you seem to be new, and confused about the issue of research/opinion. please take some time to read the basics about verifiability, citing sources, and civility before you continue editing.

Thanks.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars

Polarization[edit]

Actually, the polarization article does define p and s polarization. It even has a diagram. It does not, on the other hand, define "plane of incidence", so ironically your edit was guilty of exactly the thing you were complaining about—using a technical term without defining it. I reverted to the explanation that used terms defined in the article. I'll take a look and see if I can make the definitions of p and s a little more obvious.--Srleffler 03:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dennis Franchione. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BlueAg09 (Talk) 22:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Avery Brooks. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Puchiko (Talk-email) 14:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2009[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Gustave Doré. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Quaeler (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Crestline, California. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Quaeler (talk) 15:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/192.31.106.35 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Quaeler (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

48 hour block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Nelly Furtado, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Luke4545 (talk) 01:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Brigitte Gabriel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bogey97 (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jimmy Cicero. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Swift[edit]

Please see my responses on the article's talk page. Also, I'd like to point out that you have been warned by many people before about shoving your opinion in articles without citing reliable sources. Please do not revert the page again. Ricardiana (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Impostor (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. magnius (talk) 21:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Geoduck do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 15:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Binford, North Dakota, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Binford, North Dakota was changed by 192.31.106.34 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-04-28T13:00:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Uncle Tom, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 02:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Baby Got Back[edit]

The Barnstar of Good Humor
Awarded for your superb synopsis of the song. Absolutely brilliant; I love your style. Ref. [1] - fantastic.  Chzz  ►  22:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Endorse barnstar, excellent synopsis ;) GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Endorse barnstar, I adore you ability to word such a silly song into a professional and scholarly article. I may use your article as an example in the future. Props! -- Crazysane (T/C\D) 12:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated to the above, but thanks again for your identification of the copyright violation over at Carlos Cuadrado. I've gone through and removed it from the article history, so it's taken care of. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • More privacy. Your IP address will no longer be visible to casual readers or most other users.
  • The use of a username of your choice
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
  • Your own user page
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
  • The ability to rename pages
  • The ability to upload images
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
  • The eligibility to run for administrator, although in practice, this requires considerable experience
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create a new account. We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia as a Wikipedian! 

 Chzz  ►  22:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Tommy Archer has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — SpikeToronto 20:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nguyen Khanh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 22:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your responses to Conspiracy Theory show[edit]

To the last person who said this is a discussion about the article only...this board is for discussing the show which the article is written about. If something changes with the show, it affects the article. By the way, we might want to mention how there are some behind the scenes things going on. Alex Jones said along with multiple other alternative media outlets that the Police State episode was only aired once even though it was scheduled to re-air two more times and pulled both times. It is because of pressure from our government and elites about the truth behind the Police State episode that they don't want it aired again. Also they are doing an episode on the BP Oil Spill, I heard Alex Jones mention that too who is in the episode as a consultant he said. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.31.106.34 (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this board is for discussing the show which the article is written about
Sorry, it's not. READ: WP:TPG. You will see Talk Pages are reserved for discussing specifically article content and ways to improve it. It's not for unrelated information about the article's subject. Meaning it's not for asking why TruTV pulled an episode, or rescheduled things, your personal opinions about the show. Take those topics to some other off-site discussion forum.
If something changes with the show, it affects the article.
Um, yeah it effects as far as an accurate air date which I at least try to keep on top of. Yes, dates change, it happens, I'm sure orbital mind control lasers had nothing to do with it.
It is because of pressure from our government and elites about the truth behind the Police State episode that they don't want it aired again.
Again thats your PERSONAL OPINION and your drawing conclusions that aren't proven. In case you didn't notice, several networks made abrupt changes to shows last month and this month because of the holidays. I edit other TV shows like Ghost Hunters, Ancient Aliens, Fact or Faked, even Hollywood Treasure and their schedules were all screwed up from what was on their official network pages.
I heard Alex Jones mention...
Maybe you listen to a little too much Alex Jones. Cyberia23 (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing RC-135, you may be blocked from editing. — BQZip01 — talk 05:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Binford, North Dakota, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jsayre64 (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Major Major Major Major discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Major Major Major Major". Thank you. --— Fourthords | =Λ= | 04:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Yintan. Your recent edit to the page TED (conference) appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yintan  09:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Winner 42. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Manspreading  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 0th, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scr★pIronIV 18:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to 0th. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Life of Adam and Eve may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of them; but only those five, Cain, Luluwa, Abel, Aklia," and Seth alone. Josephus in endnotes 8) "The number of Adam's children, as says the old tradition was thirty-three(33) sons, and twenty-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Southern Methodist University has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diannaa (talk) 22:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Reverse mortgage— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reverse mortgage. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mach Loop has been reverted.
Your edit here to Mach Loop was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrnkmjxiEdY&feature=youtu.be) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Marian Fell Library— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 14:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Boy Scouts of America— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sitara Hewitt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex (Talk) 20:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ifnord. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Freedom High School (Loudoun County, Virginia) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 13:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Lake Howell High School. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 02:55, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, USS Midway (CV-41), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 17:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

"Jack Kister" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Jack Kister. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 2#Jack Kister until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:192.31.106.34&oldid=1143532278"