Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unreality of Time

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was move to wikisource. Mackensen (talk) 05:20, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Unreality of Time

This does not look like an encycopledia article to me. It seems to be the full text of a paper published in 1908. Perhaps it should be on Wikisource?? Aleph4 23:11, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Perhaps it should be on WP:CP. Check that first. Uncle G 05:32, 2005 Feb 11 (UTC)
• Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. —Korath (Talk) 00:29, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Since this is from 1908, it's not a copyright problem. Transwiki to Wikisource. RickK 06:32, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wikisource. Megan1967 10:14, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. A short spin through Word made the thing actually readable. -- Kizor 23:11, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. However, this is a very important article in the history of the philosophy of time and I would suggest that, after transfer, this heading is turned into a stub with a link to wikisource. I have some notes somewhere that summarise the article (if I can find them!).Loxley 11:03, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps a link in the relevant article? -- Kizor 23:57, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.