Talk:General Jewish Labour Bund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

Re "destroyed both its base and, according to (most/some), its ideological validity" I don't want to get into an edit war, so let me explain myself. Jayjg, could you also explain why you feel so strongly about "most"? I'm not disputing that the Bund lost most of its support after the war, I'm disputing that most people think that it lots its ideological validity. They're different things, and I Think that the word "most" here is POV. (Incidentially, there were still Bundist haggadot being published in the US after the war, suggesting enough supporters still around to sustain book publishing.) Serious historians debate the cause the rise of Zionism among Holocaust survivors, but to suggest (as I think the current wording of the article does) that "most" people were liberated from concentration camps and said "oops, I guess the Bund didn't help, I guess I'll go to Israel" is historically inaccurate. -- Remes 15:32, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Note the sentence immediately following the one in question "By 1945 few of the surviving eastern European Jews believed any longer in the Bund's particular vision of socialism or in a future for the Jews in Europe, and most of the survivors emigrated to Israel." If they didn't believe in its vision, and emigrated to Israel, then who was actually supporting its ideological validity, aside from some remnants in the US who weren't directly affected by the Holocaust? Jayjg 16:02, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Well, to be honest, I don't think that sentence is so great either, because it rather flattens a good deal of historical experience and historical debate. But encylopedias flatten; so be it. Saying that most survivors no longer supported the Bund is the same as that they denied its "ideological validity." I disagree with lots of things without saying that they have no ideological validity. To me, that phrase means, if it means anything at all, that the ideology in question was wrong and was always wrong. I don't there's any evidence that says that "most" survivors thought that. Further, I think that in this context "according to most" is a code for "according to the author." I think it's a NPOV-seeming way around being POV, and I think that's how it will be read. Can we compromise and say "according to many"? Remes 04:38, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Sure. Jayjg 01:04, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Done. Incidentially, I just got a new book on Soviet anti-Bund persecution (during the Soviet occupation of Poland during the era of the non-aggression pact), so I might make some additions and changes to this article. It probably won't be for a while though, and I'll post in Talk: if I think anything I'm doing might be controversial. Remes 04:17, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Mistransliterated?[edit]

The first paragraph currently starts with "The General Jewish Labour Union of Lithuania, Poland and Russia, in Yiddish the Algemeyner Yidisher Arbeter Bund in Lite, Poyln un Rusland". However the actual Yiddish name that's given in parentheses appears to be "Algemeyner Yidisher Arbitersbund ayn Rusland, Lite, und Poyln." Can someone who (unlike me) actually speaks the language or is familiar with the subject fix this or clarify the discrepancy? Zyqqh 11:45, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

You're right about the discrepancy, but I don't know which one is correct. Jayjg (talk) 15:51, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

There was a long discussion about this when I first wrote this article, in which several editors highly competent in Yiddish got involved. The conclusions were (a) that Yiddish is an unstable language with several regional variants and also no fixed transliteration into the Roman alphabet and (b) that there is no one historically "correct" rendering of the name. The current version is the one they seemed to agree was least objectionable. User:Danny, if he's still around, would be able to tell you more. Adam 22:16, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think the question was more about the order of the countries listed, rather than the transliteration. Are you saying that the order of the country names in the title changed? Jayjg (talk) 03:44, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
In Yiddish, Lithuania is not "Litah", but "Lite". The letter ע in ליטע (Lite) is pronunced [e]. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%98%D7%A2 --Manfariel (talk) 17:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve corrected the name and its transliteration, and included a source for the former. --Babel fish (talk) 19:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello, I am looking for people, who can tell my a bout the BUnd in Germany and today in the world --Steve2 11:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)11:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't the Bundist also pro-Nazi German-American organization of the 1930s?[edit]

Thats the 2nd definition, verbatim, on the Merriam Webster online dictionary.

Also, a Nazi is called a good little bundist in the movie Stalag 17.

Sefton: "He's a Nazi, Price is. For all I know his name is Preissinger or Preishoffer. Oh, sure, he lived in Cleveland. But when the war broke out, he came back to the Fatherland like a good little Bundist. He spoke our lingo, so they sent him to spy school and fixed him up with phony dog tags."

I mean the jewish labor bund in germany
The Stalag 17 reference was to a different "Bund": see German-American Bund. The German word "Bund" means "union", and can be used as a shortcut to all kids of unions. Ahasuerus 02:34, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bund in germany[edit]

No I mean the General Jewish Labor Union in Germany, this Bund was also in Germany active under the jews and i want some informations

unsourced POV[edit]

"The massacre of Polish Jewry during the Holocaust destroyed both its base and, in the eyes of many surviving Polish Jews, its ideological validity."

Somehow I get the impression that a number of Wikipedians are keen to diss on everything progressive and anti-Zionist in the larger Jewish community - even if it's from sixty years ago!

Bundists in the Spanish Civil War[edit]

I think that is very important to talk about the bundism in the spanish civil war, because they some the jew communist an socialists, were in Spain defending the Second Republic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.152.60.87 (talk) 09:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Bundists were indeed fighting in the Spanish Civil War. We need to add this as well. After that, it should talk about this on the Spanish Civil War article, and if need be, redirect to the main article or section. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 23:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger between General Jewish Labor Union and Jewish Bolshevism[edit]

Jossi has proposed that Jewish Bolshevism be merged into this article. On first glance this seems to be a very unusual proposal. This article is about "a Jewish political party in several European countries operating predominantly between the 1890s and the 1930s" and the other article is about "an antisemitic political epithet; it is the antisemitic conspiracy theory which blames the Jews for Bolshevism and everything else." Certainly there are historical links between conspiracies and political/labor unions, and these links should be noted, but I fail to see a stronger connection.

I am unfamiliar with either the history or politics of the phrase "Jewish Bolshevism", but perhaps if this is an attempt to remove the article from Wikipedia the {{AfD}} tag would be more appropriate? --Bookandcoffee 20:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Bolshevism looks like a very confused article. The lede is about an epithet and antisemitic booklet, but the article is also about (genuine) Jewish Bolsheviks and Jewish revolutionary anti-Bolsheviks in the nascent Soviet Union. Nevertheless, the article does have a small section about the Bund. I oppose a merger, as the articles barely overlap. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 21:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Malik S. BobFromBrockley 17:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bund in Sweden[edit]

Interesting material, at [1]. --Soman (talk) 13:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture[edit]

Can anyone verify whether Image:Ac.manif1917.jpg really is a photo of a Bund rally? http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/Beyond-The-Pale/eng_captions/41-2.html says the demonstrators belong to the Jewish Socialist Workers Party. --Soman (talk) 19:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.berdichev.org/jewsinurss_a_1.htm says the same. --Soman (talk) 20:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed the photo now, to an image that is definately of the Bund. --Soman (talk) 21:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad title[edit]

The organization is pretty universally known as the Bund - it seems to me that the word "Bund" ought to be in the article title. john k (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved now. --Soman (talk) 10:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project PLEASE READ[edit]

Hello all,

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project is a project that was established in order to create and edit pages about the General Jewish Labour Union, or Bund, on Wikipedia. The project's main goal is to create a network of "editors" who will continue to create and edit Wikipedia pages about the Bund. Please join the Task Force. For more info, please visit http://bundwiki.weebly.com/. Thanks. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Just a note, where possible, priority should be for references/citations available in English. Thanks.--Goldsztajn (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree: the richness of the English wikipedia is just the heterogeneity and language skills variety of its contributors. I would agree if for instance in an article over the Armenian genocide some (self-censored) would begin adding a lot of references in Turkish from Yusuf Halaçoğlu supporting the allegation that Armenians genocided Turks and not the contrary. But in the case of the Bund I hope there are less contentious issues, even if I read some horrors in some Zionist propaganda literature about the Bund during WWII, they sometimes don't even mention that Edelman was a Bundist. Moreover there are several contributors who understand several languages and seem to know a lot about the Bund, so if some contribution with a non-English reference seems odd at any moment, I guess it will be discussed here. --Pylambert (talk) 21:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You disagree with WP:NONENG?...that's all I was suggesting.--Goldsztajn (talk) 12:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some very general thoughts (no pun intended)[edit]

The article needs a better structure, would propose something like this:
1. Emergence
2. Growth and inter-war years
3. WW2 and destruction
4. Immediate post-war
5. Legacy

At present the ideological differences between the Bund, the Bolsheviks and Zionists are not very explicit in the article. The role of the Bund as a Jewish defence organisation should be larger, IMO, eg its support grew especially in Poland in the late 1930s as it was seen to be the most effective Jewish organisation struggling against antisemitism.--Goldsztajn (talk) 15:51, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

בונד or בּונד?[edit]

I just changed the Yiddish spelling of Bund from בונד to בּונד, however, I then noticed that the project task force page has a request for use of YIVO standardisation. It seems "בּ" for "b" is not part of the YIVO standard. I think though given that the Bund itself used בּונד (as can be seen in the photo in the lede, or in this photo) using בּ is more appropriate in this case. --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Using בּונד is appropriate in this case. Even if the YIVO Standardization might say otherwise. That is why on the Task Force's page that you mentioned, it said when applicable. Thanks for bringing this to the discussion. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 05:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to General Jewish Labor Union[edit]

The current title "General Jewish Labour Bund" is an odd mixture and has only 2 Google book hits, and 38 when "Labor" is used. "General Jewish Labor Union" has over 200 Google book hits, though. Also, the proper Algemeyner Yidisher Arbeter Bund has around 100 hits. -- Matthead  Discuß   17:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the usual problem with whether to use English or American spelling - the only Wiki guideline I'm aware of on this just says to be consistent. Personally I usually use American spelling, if for no other reason then that then my computer doesn't red-mark everything as a misspelling. Since there's more Google book hits for "Labor" - I'd support Matthead's proposal. But I don't have strong feelings either way on this.radek (talk) 05:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Currently, this article is titled General Jewish Labour Bund. It was recently changed to as such from what you propose, General Jewish Labour Union. Although in you may get more "hits" (results) when searching on books, it is more commonly referred to by Bundists as the "Jewish Labour Bund" (ok, so we kept the "General" part, to keep it closer to its original form - General Jewish Labour Union). I completely disagree with renaming it by its Yiddish transliteration. I propose we keep it as it is. This needs more discussion. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever the name or the spelling, the word "Bund" needs to be somewhere in there.radek (talk) 05:46, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen it most commonly as "Jewish Labor Bund" (without "General"). As far as Labor or Labour, don't focus on Google hits; see WP:ENGVAR. Generally, American topics get American spelling, British topics get British spelling, and everything else depends on the style preferred by the first major contributor to the article. Most importantly, consistency counts. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My preference is to stick with British spelling. Re the name, "the Bund" is the most common term, surely. Because "the Bund" is the most common, there is no prevailing fuller phrase, which probably reflects contemporary reality as histories and participant accounts of the Bund emerged in multiple languages and countries in the post war period. The present title may be a little cumbersome, but it is IMO the best representation in English of the full name of the organisation. --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, "The Bund" would be my own personal preference but it does appear that there is a lot of English sources on the area of Shanghai.radek (talk) 03:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

split into three?[edit]

I started a thread at Wikipedia_talk:Jewish_Labour_Bund_Task_Force#Trifurcation_of_main_article.3F. --Soman (talk) 16:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional titles[edit]

In the first paragraph of this article, it says that the General Jewish Labour Bund is known as:

  • General Jewish Labour Bund of Lithuania, Poland and Russia
  • אַלגעמײַנער ײדישער אַרבעטער בּונד אין ליטע פוילין און רוסלאַנד, Algemeyner Yidisher Arbeter Bund in Lite, Poyln un Rusland
  • The Bund, בּונד
  • Jewish Labour Bund

It needs to also say that it is known as:

  • The General Jewish Workers Bund of Lithuania, Poland and Russia
  • The General Jewish Workers Bund
  • Jewish Labor Bund

(Needs to specify when it is called the Jewish Labour Bund (with a "u") and Jewish Labor Bund (without a "u").) (I think it has also been called:)

  • The General Jewish Workers Union of Lithuania, Poland and Russia
  • The General Jewish Workers Union

I brought this up so someone can organize the titles in a better format, with the consent of everyone else. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 22:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

articles in Ukrainian and Russian wikis[edit]

There is a strange sentence in, the article in the Ukrainian wiki, "Під час Першої світової війни Бунд займав соціал-шовіністичні позиції.", i.e. (according to the Google translator) "During World War Bund held social chauvinist position." ! The Russian wiki article includes interesting data (numbers of Bund's members: 34,000 during the 1905-1907 Revolution; 2,000 in October 1910; 34,000 after the February Revolution), but without sources (there are general references at the end of the article, but no inline refs). It would be interesting to somewhat coordinate the various versions of the main Bund article to modify POV versions such as the Ukrainian one and to ask the Russian contributors to add refs so that their info could be recycled on the other wikis.--Pylambert (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a strange sentence, but rather a copy-paste from the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Since GSE is public domain, texts from it are used as base for articles in some of the Soviet language wikis. --Soman (talk) 11:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
No consensus for a specific action and stale for almost 2 years. Klbrain (talk) 15:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that General Jewish Labour Bund in Belarus be merged into General Jewish Labour Bund in Lithuania, Poland and Russia. See, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Jewish Labour Bund in Belarus. The are no sources that indicate the existence of a distinct organization for the Bund in present-day Belarus. Many of the cities that today are part of Belarus were epicentres of activism of the Russian Bund. The Gomel and Minsk conferences were conferences of the Russian Bund. The part on BNR participation is unsourced for years now, I could not find references online. --Soman (talk) 09:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC) ping Czalex (talk · contribs), Piotrus (talk · contribs), Biruitorul‎ (talk · contribs), Pylambert (talk · contribs), IZAK (talk · contribs), הסרפד (talk · contribs) --Soman (talk) 09:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not. Rather the original article should be renamed in General Jewish Labour Bund of Russia as the article states that its members were mainly against seperatism, while the article related to Belarus should be renamed into General Jewish Labour Bund of Western Lands as it seems that members of the Belarusian Bund were part of the Central Council of Ukraine, while participating in an attempt of forming a Belarusian state. Also, it looks awkwardly mentioning of Poland in the name when the Polish Bund separated soon after the occupation of Poland by German troops. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 16:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, could there be merged the Communist Bund (Ukraine) and the General Jewish Labour Bund in Belarus? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Communist Bund (Ukraine) was a different party. Also, I think that the references for any separate party organization in Belarus or Western Lands are missing so far. --Soman (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support if renamed. Instead of "General Jewish Labour Bund of [...]" it seems natural to me to simply use "General Jewish Labour Bund", redirecting other Jewish Labour Bunds to this article and merging them. In the Bundism and International Jewish Labor Bund articles the page is also referred to as the General Jewish Labour Bund. Seriously, we have too many of these Bund and Labor articles. Prinsgezinde (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that 'General Jewish Labour Bund is used for two separate parties, the Russian Bund (i.e. this article) and the Polish Bund. However, there was never a Belarusian Bund, the branches of the party in present-day Belarus was part of the Russian party. --Soman (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Soman - Just make the merge happen. The official name of the organization remains the official name of the organization; the fact is that it also conducted activities in Belorussia (and Ukraine), which can easily be described within the history of the organization. I'm gonna pull down the 1-year old Merge Discussion template... Carrite (talk) 19:21, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Geographic conflict[edit]

Since when Ekaterinoburg and Bobruisk were part of Ukraine??? Please, check section 1917. Also, why Ekaterinoburg is redirected to Yekaterinburg? Could it be a misnomer for Yekaterinoslav?? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 16:32, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Jewish Labour Bund in Lithuania, Poland and Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 July 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested. I have created a new disambiguation page at General Jewish Labour Bund (disambiguation) and will add a hatnote to the page here that makes it clear that this article is about the "Lithuania, Poland and Russia" version. Dekimasuよ! 21:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


General Jewish Labour Bund in Lithuania, Poland and Russia → General Jewish Labour Bund – This is the original and primary incarnation of the Bund, and the miscellany of geographical disambiguators just adds confusion as to whether this is the main one or not. This would also match more closely how the article is titled in other Wikipedia language editions. Pharos (talk) 16:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 21:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom.--Darwinek (talk) 23:58, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, I think this is one of the cases where having a full and formal name helps understanding. Up to 2009, this article didn't differentiate between the different Bund parties at all. A lot of literature conflates the Russia and Poland Bund parties or presume that the Bund functioned as an International of sorts (like Poalei Zion). --Soman (talk) 07:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Soman: I don't think it helps but confuses; I come across this article randomly once a year or so, and I'm always perplexed by whether or not this is the primary incarnation, or one of the derivative groups.--Pharos (talk) 14:45, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Belorussia[edit]

I redirected General Jewish Labour Bund in Belarus here, partially as we have no evidence that a specific Belarusian chapter of the Bund or a separate Belorussian Bund party ever existed, partially as all the material of that article is now covered elsewhere. That article essentially contained 4 disparate pieces of information;

  1. "The Belarusian chapter of the General Jewish Labour Bund was among political parties forming the government and parliament of the Belarusian People's Republic gaining independence in 1918.[citation needed] Members of the Bund became members of the Parliament. Bund member Mojżesz Gutman even became a Minister without portfolio in the Government of the newly created republic and drafted its constitution.[citation needed] The Bund left later the government bodies of the BNR.[citation needed]" - these unsourced passages have now been included in the main Bund article. Needs references, though.
  2. "Contrarily to the attitude of the Communist party in Ukraine and Russia proper, the Communist Party (bolsheviks) of Lithuania and Belorussia agreed to integrate in its ranks the local Bund, renamed Belarusian Kombund in April 1920 after the Twelfth Conference of the Bund on April 12–19, 1920 in Gomel, into an autonomous Jewish Communist Party, thus not forcing individual members either to join directly the party or through the Yevsektsiya. They even demanded the Yevsektsiya to be dissolved into the Kombund. This seems however to have been a mere agreement on paper that was never implemented, a manoeuver by the Communists to attract support from Bundists as the Bund was more powerful than them in the Belarusian cities.[1]" - this seems to refer to the Komfarband of Bielorussia and Lithuania? The dates appear mixed up, however. But I don't think this process happened twice
  3. "In 1921, at its Thirteenth Conference of the still "General Jewish Labour Bund in Lithuania, Poland and Russia", i.e. then in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, a majority of the Bundist delegates decided to dissolve the party, and part of its membership joined the R.C.P.(B.) on the basis of the rules of admission,[2] while the minority formed the Social Democratic Bund." - there is nothing specifically 'Belorussian' about this passage. The Gomel conference was the conference of the Russian Bund. This conference is discussed in the main Bund article.
  4. "In West Belarus, that was part of interwar Poland, the remnants of the party finally merged into the Polish Bund, while many activists chose to join the Polish Communist Party." - this passage is now included in the main Bund article. Need a reference, though.

--Soman (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Levin, Nora (1990). The Jews in the Soviet Union Since 1917: Paradox of Survival. New York: New York University Press. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-8147-5051-3. Retrieved 2009-11-10.
  2. ^ explanatory note to Lenin, Vladimir I. (April 19 – May 6, 1920). "To Members of the Politbureau of the C.C., R.C.P.(B.)". Marxists Internet Archive. Lenin Internet Archive (2003). Retrieved 2009-11-10., from documents archived at the Central Party Archives, Institute of Marxism-Leninism of the C.C., C.P.S.TJ.

Party organization?[edit]

Is there any good reference on how the party was organized internally (preferably in English)? Especially with some numbers of how the membership was distributed geographically? I haven't come across any so far, but encountering a number of mentions of different regional units;

Material on party organization in current wiki article[edit]

In the article we have at the moment:

  • "In February 1905 a Polish Regional Committee was formed, gathering the local party branches in the areas of Congress Poland (except in the cities of Warsaw and Lodz).[1]"
  • "In December 1918 the Latvia District Committee of the Bund began publishing the newspaper Undzer Tsayt ('Our Time').[2]"
  • "Four Bund bureaus were represented as such among the 60 delegates to the May 1918 Menshevik Party conference: Moscow (Abramovich), Northern (Erlich), Western (Goldshtein, Melamed) and Occupied Lands (Aizenshtadt).[3]"
  • "After the issuing of the First Universal of the Central Rada (Council) of Ukraine, the Southern Bureau of the Bund issued a statement rejecting the declaration of Ukrainian autonomy.[4]"

Local units and districts around 1903[edit]

Two accounts on the internal organization of the Bund around 1903, somewhat contradictory:

Party committees around 1917-1921[edit]

Looking at the later stages of Bund, 1917-1921, this reference makes mention of various committees;

  • Petrograd, Moscow, Minsk, Gomel Bureau CC of Bund [does this mean the CC bureau was based in all these locations?], General Committee of Bund for Great Russia (1917-1920), Mobilization Commission of CC of Bund [seemingly coordinating bundists in the Red Army] (1919-1920), Bund had Oblast (Regional), Governorate, City, as well as other, organizations, Southern Regional Committee of Bund (1917), General Committee of the Bund for the Ukraine (1918-1920), Kiev, Ekaterinoslav, Nizhyn, Chernobyl committees of Bund (1917-1921), North-Western Regional Committee, Minsk, Barysaw, Orsha, Slutsk Committees (1917-1921), Moscow and Siberian Regional Committees, Petrograd, Penza, Harbin and other committees (1917-1920). ("Петроградского, Московского, Минского, Гомельского бюро ЦК Бунда, Главного комитета Бунда Велико- россии (1917—1920); материалы мобилизационной комиссии ЦК Бунда: постановления ЦК, переписка с организациями и отдельными лицами по вопросам мобилизации членов Бунда в Красную Армию (1919—1920); воззвания, письма, телеграммы ЦК Бунда, касающиеся работы бундовских организаций в Польше; протоколы, листовки, резолюции, письма местных организаций, присланные в ЦК Бунда в качестве информации (1917—1921); переписка [...] 4. Материалы областных (региональных), губернских, городских и др. организаций Бунда: протоколы, резолюции [...] Южного областного комитета Бунда (1917), Главного комитета Бунда Украины (1918—1920), Киевского, Екатеринославского, Нежинского, Чернобыльского комитетов (1917—1921), Северо- Западного областного комитета, Минского, Борисовского, Оршанского, Слуцкого комитетов (1917—1921), Московского и Сибирского областных комитетов, Петроградского, Пензенского, Харбинского и др. комитетов (1917— 1920)"[8]
  • Seems that the General Committees would have appeared only after 1917? Some sort of a re-organization as Ukraine, Poland, Baltics etc separated from Russia?
  • The Southern Regional Committee would have been the Bund organization up to 1917. In 1918 a General Committee for Ukraine appears. Possibly linked to re-organization after the Kombund split Note "Южного Областного Комитета Бунда"[9] "Главного Украинского комитета Бунда"[10]

Seems the formal name of Bund organizations at city-level, at least in cities were the Bund had a certain size was [Foo] Committee of Bund Organizations;

  • Irkutsk Committee of Bund Organizations ("комитета иркутской организации Бунда"[11]
  • Ufa Committee of Bund Organizations ("Составлено и подано в наш комитет заявление: «Мы, нижеподписавшиеся, бывшие члены Уфимского комитета организации Бунда, находя, что линия поведения ЦК местного комитета Бунда является преступной по отношению к")[12]

And furthermore;

  • This ref indicates that there were both Odessa District and City Committees ("Район и Город Комитеты („Бунда“) Од.")[13]
  • Glock, organ of the Bund Committee in Poland[14]
  • North-Western Committee, representative Ester Frumkin ("Усилилась роль областных организаций Бунда . Представитель Северо - западного комитета Бунда Эстер Фрумкина отмечает , что политическая линия Сев . - западного комитета резко расходится с позицией ЦК Бунда , вполне")[15]
  • The party had local committees ("местного комитета Бунда")[16] ("мѣстнаго комитета Бунда")[17]
  • Gomel Committee - activities stopped under martial law at outbreak of WWI, resumed in March 1917. Active in the Gomel soviet ("В начале Первой мировой войны и введенного военного положения деятельность комитета Бунда прекратилась и возобновилась лишь в марте 1917 г. Представители комитета вошли в состав гомельского Совета рабочих и)[18]
  • Around 1917 there was a Kharkov-based South-East District Committee. Then a Ekaterinoslav-based District Committee for Ekaterinoslav, Kharkov, Taurida Governorates and Don Oblast. ("Наше Слове. Социал-демократ. еженедельник, орган группы членов Бунда, с 74 4 — орган юго-вост. районн. ком-та Бунда. Харьков. Ред.-изд.: Группа членов Харькове*. орг. Бунда, с /* 4 — юго-вост! район. ком-т Бунда [Л* 1 вышел 8 июня, /А 4 — 30 июля 1917 г.; с No 5 перенесено в Екатеринослав с подзаг.: Орган районн. ком-та Бунда для Екатеринославской, Харьковской, Таврич. губ. и Донской области, ред.-изд.: ред. комиссия при район. ком-те Бунда; No 8 вышел 12 янв. 1918 г.].")[19]

--Soman (talk) 16:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • "At the beginning of the February Revolution, large parts of the Russian Empire, such as Poland (Warsaw, Lodz), the Northwest Region (Grodno, Bialystok, Vilnius), Lithuania (Kovno), were occupied by the German army, and their political fate had Separated long ago by the fate of Russia." Yiddish: צום אנהייב פון דער פעברואר־רעוואלוציע זיינען גרויסע טיילן פון דער רוסישער אימפעריע, ווי פוילן (ווארשע, לאדזש), די צפוןמערב געגנט (גראדנע, ביאליסטאק, ווילנע), ליטע (קאוונע) געווען אקופירט דורך די דייטשע ארמייען, און זייער פאליטישער גורל האט זיך צעשיידט אויף לאנג פונם גורל פון רוסלאנד.[20] - so prior to the 1917 February Revolution, Vilna had been in the Northwest Region (di tsfunmerb gegnt), and note that "[o]f all the Bund's committees, the so-called gegnt-komitet in Lite was the last to be reorganised,379 which was partially due to Vilna's unclarified status"[21]
  • "The [Bund Central Committee] Has decided to create a bureau of its 5 members to lead the work between the plenary sessions. Two regional committees were also set up: one for the northwestern provinces in Minsk and another for southern Russia in Kiev. The Presidium of the Western Regional Committee consisted of A. Weinstein, Chairman, Dr. Y. Saumim, cashier, A. Kirzhnitz, Secretary. A commission for Central Russia was formed by [grammar check?] the Moscow Committee. It was decided that Arbeyter-Sthime in Petrograd should remain as the central organ, and in Minsk and Kiev the organs of the regional committees would be published." (Yiddish: דער צ . ק . האָט באשלאסן צו שאפן א ביורא פון 5 זיינע מיטגלידער, וואס זאלן פירן די ארבעט צווישן די פלענארע זיצונגען. מ׳האט אויך בא־ שטימט צו שאפן צוויי געגנט־קאמיטעטן: איינעם פאר די צפון־מערב־פרא־ ווינצן אין מינסק און א צווייטן פאר דרום־רוסלאנד אין קיעוו. דאס פרעזידיום פון דעם מערב־געגנט קאמיטעט איז באשטאנען פון א. ודינשטיין, פארזיצער, דר. י. תאומים, קאסירער, א. קירזשניץ, סעקרעטאר. ביים מאסקווער קא־ מיטעט איז געשאפן געווארן א קאמיסיע פאר צענטראל־רוסלאנד. ס׳איז באשטימט געווארן, אז די ארבייטער־שטימע זאל בלייבן אין פעטראגראד ווי דער צענטראל־ארגאן, און אין מינסק און קיעוו זאלן דערשיינען די ארגא־ נען פון די געגנט־קאמיטעטן.)[22] - this would be sometime in spring of 1917?? --Soman (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Provisional (Temporary?) Ukrainian General Committee of the Bund" (Yiddish: צייטווייליִקער אוקראינער הויפט - קאָמיטעט פֿון בונד)[23] - however, also uses 'Provisional Bureau of the General Ukrainian Committee of Bund', so probably it was the Bureau that was provisional. Anyhow Hofn-Komitet probably corresponds to the Russian Glavnogo Komitet, just as Gegnt-Komitet then corresponds to Oblastoy Komite? --Soman (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In Siberia[edit]

  • The ref above mentions a Siberian Regional Committee. We also have mentions of a "Western Siberian District Committee" ("член Томского и Западно-Сибирского районного комитета Бунда")[24], "Eastern Siberian Committee of Bund" ("разъясняющий соответствующие пункты Устава РСДРП (объединенной).100 Конференция поддержала инициативу Восточно- Сибирского комитета Бунда по организации кооперативного издательства и книжного магазина"[25] *West Siberian Regional Committee of Bund ("Западно-Сибирского областного комитета Бунда")[26] "Siberian Regional Committee of Bund" (" Сибирского областного комитета Бунда")[25]

General Committee for Great Russia[edit]

  • Di Hofnung ('The Hope'), organ of the General Committee of the Bund in Great Russia, published 5 issues in 1918, Moscow (Yiddish: די האָפנונג , אויסגאבע פון הויפּט ־ קאָמיטעט פון בונד אין גרויס ־ רוסלאַנד , אַרויס 5 נומערן אין 1918 , מאָסקווע) [27]
  • Di Hofnung ('The Hope'), Moscow, Organ of General Committee of the Bund for Great Russia, editor U. Rein, Editorial Board members: Abramovitch, Rubin, Heylikman. 5 issues, 10 August 19 December (Yiddish: די האָפנונג " , מאָסקווע .אָרגאַן פון הויפט - קאָמיטעט פון „ בונד " פאר גרויס - רוסלאַנד , רעדאַקטאָר ו . ריין , אין רעדאקציע : אבראמאוויטש , רובין , הייליקמאַן . נומער 5 - 1 , 10 אוגוסט 19 דעצעמבער)[28] --Soman (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuania?[edit]

Did the Bund in interwar Lithuania establish itself as a separate party, and if so, when and how? Noted that;

  • "Of all the Bund's committees, the so-called gegnt-komitet in Lite was the last to be reorganised,379 which was partially due to Vilna's unclarified status"[21] (this refers to Dec 1918)
  • There was a General Kombund Committee of Lithuania... but of the Communist Bund (Russia) or a separate party?? - "В 1920 г . переехал в Литву , был кооптирован в члены главного комитета Комбунда Литвы — левой оппозиционной части Бунда . организаторов ликвидации Комбунда в июне 1921 г ."[29]
  • "The PPS wanted some kind of federation with Poland and Lithuania, the Lithuanians wanted Lithuania, the White Russians White Russia, while the Bund saw Vilna's future as linked to Russia." (reference to 1918...)[30]

--Soman (talk) 19:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The right wing of the Bund, based in the Vilna Regional Committee, used the Unzer shtime, edited by Max Weinreich, to advocate Bundist participation in the kehile."[31] (Dec 1918) --Soman (talk) 10:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "In Moscow in November 1920, I was delegated to the Plenum of the Russian Central Committee of the "Bund" in Moscow as the messenger [representative?] of the General Committee of the "Bund" in Lithuania" (Yiddish: אין מאָסקווע אין נאָוועמבער 1920 ווער איך דעלעגירט צום פלענום פון רוסי לענדישן צענטראַל ־ קאָמיטעט פון „ בונד " אין מאָסקווע ווי דער שליח פון הויפּט - קאָמיטעט פון „ בונד " אין ליטע) - I'm not 100% sure whether the person talks about the Kombund or the Bund (S.D.) here... but appears that there wasn't a separate Bund party in Lithuania as of Nov 1920... --Soman (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Vilno Bund organization, which considered itself more Russian than Polish, had split in 1920, the vast majority of its members going over to the Communist Bund."[32]
  • From the Polish Bund wiki article: "The Bund branch in Wilno[33] (now Vilnius) had split along the same lines as the rest of the Russian Bund in 1920, into a left-wing majority group and a right-wing minorities group. The latter was associated with the Russian Social Democratic Bund. Both groups were reluctant to join the Polish Bund, even after it had become apparent that Wilno was an integrated part of the Polish state. The Wilno Social Democratic Bund distrusted the Polish Bund for its overtures to the Comintern, stating that the Polish Bund had ceased to be a Social Democratic organization.[34] In 1923 both Wilno Bund groups merged into the Polish Bund.[34]" - So the right-wing Vilna Bund presumably continued to be part of the Russian Bund (S.D.) until the merger, but what about the Vilna left-wing Bund? What role did it have after the Bund in Russia proper had merged with RKP(b) and the Kombundists in Kovno had merged with the Communist Party of Lithuania? --Soman (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bund was not represented in the Council of Lithuania - 'The Bund spoke out against Lithuania's statehood because of its political attitudes.' ("Prieš Lietuvos valstybingumą dėl savo politinių nuostatų pasisakė „Bundas".")[35] --Soman (talk) 23:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • May 1917 - Bund called for Lithuanian autonomy in a federal Russian state.[36] Bund had good relations with Lithuanian Social Democratic Party.[36]
  • Kaunas City Council election December 1918 - "Jüdische Sozialdemokratenbund (15 kandidaten, 6 mandate)"[37] another ref for 6 seats for Bund[38]

Liber's entry in party leadership? Name of the party in 1918?[edit]

  • 'A brief rapprochement between the Menshevik Party and Bund occurred in May 1918, when Liber entered the makeup of the General Committee of the Bund in Soviet Russia (then Ukraine was ripped from Moscow).' (Yiddish: אַ קורצע דערנענטערונג סיי מיט דער מעטשעווסטישער פּאַרטיי סיי מיטן בונד איז פארגעקומען אין מאַי 1918 , ווען ליבער איז אריין אין דעם באַשטאַנד פון דעם הויפט - קאָמיטעט פון בונד אין סאָוועט ־ רוסלאַנד (דעמאָלט איז אוי קראַינע געווען אָפּגעריסן פון מאָסקווע))[39] - I'm a bit confused here - Liber entered in the Bund CC or in one of the General Committees? Notably it seems that the Bund preferred the term 'Ratn-Rusland' rather than 'Soviet Rusland', so I'm not sure the name is authentic. And not sure when the party changed its name of 'Bund in Ratn-Rusland' (perhaps around this time?). The passage about Ukraine being separated from Moscow refers to the country, not the Bund branch presumably. --Soman (talk) 22:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Joshua D. Zimmerman (2004). Poles, Jews, and the Politics of Nationality: The Bund and the Polish Socialist Party in Late Tsarist Russia, 1892-1914. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 317. ISBN 978-0-299-19460-4.
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference gelv was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Brovkin, Vladimir. N. (1991). The Mensheviks after October: socialist opposition and the rise of the Bolshevik dictatorship. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. pp. 201–204. ISBN 978-0-8014-9976-0. Retrieved 2009-11-10.
  4. ^ George O. Liber (1 January 2016). Total Wars and the Making of Modern Ukraine, 1914-1954. University of Toronto Press. pp. 59–60. ISBN 978-1-4426-2708-6.
  5. ^ Vladimir Akimov (1969). Vladimir Akimov on the Dilemmas of Russian Marxism 1895-1903: The Second Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party : A Short History of the Social Democratic Movement in Russia. CUP Archive. p. 227. GGKEY:QTN35JK3C26.
  6. ^ Российская социал-демократическая рабочая партия. Съезд; Институт марксизма-ленинизма (Moscow, Russia) (1959). Второй съезд РСДРП, июль-август 1903 года. Гос. изд-во полит. лит-ры. p. 507.
  7. ^ Jewish social studies. 1968. p. 248.
  8. ^ О. В. Будницкий (2005). Архив еврейской истории. РОССПЭН. p. 344. ISBN 978-5-8243-0599-9.
  9. ^ Жива Галили й Гарсия; Альберт Павлович Ненароков; Леопольд Х. Хаймсон (1997). Меньшевики в 1917 году: От корниловского мятежа до конца декабря: ч. 1. От корниловского мятежа до Временного Демократического Совета Российской Республики (август-первая декада октября). Прогресс-Академия. p. 192.
  10. ^ Ефим Иосифович Меламед; М. С Куповецкий; Российский государственный гуманитарный университет. Центр библеистики и иудаики (2006). Документы по истории и культуре евреев в архивах Киева: путеводитель. Дух и литера. p. 318. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ Ирина Владимировна Нам; Наталья Ивановна Наумова (2003). Еврейская диаспора Сибири в условиях смены политических режимов: март 1917 - февраль 1920 гг. Кларетианум. p. 216. ISBN 978-5-94491-070-7.
  12. ^ Institut marksizma-leninizma (Moscow, Russia) (1960). Perepiska Sekretariata T︠S︡K RKP(b) s mestnymi partiĭnymi organizat︠s︡ii︠a︡mi. Izd-vo polit. litry. p. 242.
  13. ^ Prat︠s︡i Odesʹkoï t︠s︡entralʹnoï naukovo ̈biblioteky. Biblioteka. 1927. p. 160.
  14. ^ Bolʹshai͡a sovetskai͡a ėnt͡siklopedii͡a. 1927. p. 121.
  15. ^ N. Avdeev (1930). Revoli︠u︡t︠s︡ii︠a︡ 1917 [i.e. tysi︠a︡cha devi︠a︡tʹsot semnadt︠s︡atogo] goda: khronika sobytiĭ. Gos. izd-vo. p. 307.
  16. ^ Viktor Petrovich Grinevich (1923). Professionalʹnoe dvizhenie rabochikh v Rossii. Vypusk pervyĭ. S predisloviem F. Seni︠u︡shkina. Glavpolitprosvet, Izdatelʹstvo "Krasnai︠a︡ novʹ". p. 182.
  17. ^ Obshchestvennoe dvizhenie v Rossii v nachale XX-go veka: Mezhdunarodnoe polozhenie Rossii pered revoli︠u︡t︠s︡ieĭ. Massovoe dvizhenie. Glavneĭshie momenty v istorii russkago marksizma. 2 v. Tip. T-va "Obshchestvennai︠a︡ polʹza,". 1910. p. 322.
  18. ^ Моше Давид Хаят (2008). Возрожденный из пепла. Izd-vo T͡Sur-Ot. p. 34. ISBN 978-965-7348-18-5.
  19. ^ И. В Яшунский (1970). Еврейская периодическая печать в 1917 и 1918 гг. Aticot. p. 19.
  20. ^ R.R. Abramovitch. In tsvey rev?olutsyes Di geshikh e fun a dor. Рипол Классик. p. 43. ISBN 978-5-88109-329-7.
  21. ^ a b Susanne Marten-Finnis (2004). Vilna as a Centre of the Modern Jewish Press, 1840-1928: Aspirations, Challenges, and Progress. Peter Lang. p. 131. ISBN 978-3-03910-080-4.
  22. ^ Gregor Aronson; Jacob Sholem Hertz (1966). די געשיכטע פון בונד. Unzer tsayṭ. p. 100.
  23. ^ Абрам Киржниц; Дзяржаўная бібліятэка і бібліяграфічны інстытут БССР. Яўрэйскі аддзел (1928). די יידישע פרעסע אין ראטנפארבאנד (1917-1927). ווייסרוסלענדישע ביכער-קאמער בא דער ווייסרוסלענדישער מעלוכע-ביבליאטָעק. p. 9.
  24. ^ Лариса Александровна Кутилова (1999). Национальные меньшинства Томской губернии: хроника общественной и культурной жизни 1885-1919. Изд-во Томского университета. pp. 274–275.
  25. ^ a b Ирина Владимировна Нам; Наталья Ивановна Наумова (2003). Еврейская диаспора Сибири в условиях смены политических режимов: март 1917 - февраль 1920 гг. Кларетианум. p. 98. ISBN 978-5-94491-070-7.
  26. ^ Сибирский предпарламент. Частные совещания членов Временной Сибирской областной думы (июнь – август 1918 г.). ЛитРес. 5 September 2017. p. 146. ISBN 978-5-04-036258-5.
  27. ^ Di Geshikhṭe fun Bund. National Yiddish Book Center. 1999. p. 213.
  28. ^ ווילנע: א זאמלבוך געווידמעט דער שטאט ווילנע. ווילנער ברענטש 763 ארבייטער רינג. 1935. p. 262.
  29. ^ Partijos istorijos institutas (Vilnius, Lithuania) (1966). Вильнюсское подполье: воспоминания участников революционного движения в Вильнюсском крае, 1920-1939 гг. Вага. p. 27.
  30. ^ Yivo Annual. Northwestern University Press and the Yivo Institute for Jewish Research. 1991. p. 90.
  31. ^ Yivo Annual. Northwestern University Press and the Yivo Institute for Jewish Research. 1991. p. 70.
  32. ^ Bernard K. Johnpoll (1967). The politics of futility: the General Jewish Workers Bund of Poland, 1917-1943. Cornell University Press. p. 103.
  33. ^ Snyder, Timothy (2003). The Reconstruction of Nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569-1999. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300105865.
  34. ^ a b Johnpoll, Bernard K. The Politics of Futility; The General Jewish Workers Bund of Poland, 1917-1943. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967. pp. 132-137
  35. ^ Arkadijus Bliuminas (2003). Žydų frakcija Lietuvos Seimuose: 1920-1927 m. UAB Sapnų Sala. p. 7. ISBN 978-9955-9557-6-4.
  36. ^ a b Vladas Sirutavi?ius; Darius Stali?nas (1 January 2011). A Pragmatic Alliance: Jewish-Lithuanian Political Cooperation at the Beginning of the 20th Century. Central European University Press. pp. 140–141. ISBN 978-615-5053-17-7.
  37. ^ Rūta Eidukevičienė (2007). Von Kaunas bis Klaipėda: deutsch-jüdisch-litauisches Leben entlang der Memel. Litblockín. p. 29. ISBN 978-3-932289-95-8.
  38. ^ Darbai ir dienos. Vytauto Didžiojo Universitetas. 2003. p. 21.
  39. ^ Joel Nowikow (1967). זכרונות פון א יידישן ארבעטער. קולטור־ליגע. p. 95.

11th conference - consultative vote delegates?[edit]

I managed to extract the following from snippet view of p. 216 of Di Geshikhṭe fun Bund, Volume 3 Yiddish: רעכט זיינען געווען : ס . סעמקאווסקי (פון ו . ס . ד . א . פ . ) , א . אייזענשטאט ( צ . ק . פון בונד ) , א . בראון ( סערגיי - קאַנדיי דאָט צום צ . ק . פון בונד ) , דר . יצחק תאומים און א . סוועטיצקי ( פון מינסקער געגנט ־ קאָמיטעט ) , ראָזע לעוויט ( פון מאָסקווער געגנט ־ קאָמיטעט ) , אברהם לייב עטקין ( פון אוקראינער הויפט - קאָמיטעט ) , פראַנקפורט ( פון ווילנער געגנט ־ קאָמיטעט ) , זשעניע הורוויטש , ג - but so far haven't been able to get any useful detail from p. 217.

  • So delegates to the 1919 11th conference with consultative vote were: S. Semkowski (from Central Committee of U. S. D. A. F.), A. Eisenstadt (Bund Central Committee), A. Braun (Bund CC?), Dr. Isaac Saumim and A. Svetitsky (of the Minsk Regional Committee), Rose Levitt (of the Moscow Regional Committee), Abraham Leib Etkin (of the Ukrainian General Committee), Frankfurt (of the Vilna Regional Committee), Genia Horwich"[1]
  • This would be 9 out of 19 of the consultative vote delegates. Anyone who can access p. 217 and check the others? The 10th delegate's initial would have been "G.".
  • What was the USDAF or USDAP? - RSDAP (i.e. RSDLP) presumably
  • What's סערגיי קאַנדיידאָט? A. Braun
  • Which committee or other body did Genia Horwich represent?

--Soman (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Di Geshikhṭe fun Bund. National Yiddish Book Center. 1999. p. 216.

Merger of Communist Bund (Russia) article[edit]

I'd like to go ahead with a merger of the Communist Bund (Russia) article into this article. Most sources don't see the 1920 Kombund as a separate party from the main Bund, and I cannot find any clear indications that the Kombund would have presented itself as anything else than the Bund during this period. Notably it seems at Der Veker (Minsk), the main organ at the time, was published as the "tsentral organ fun „bund“ 'in ratn-rusland" (Central organ of the 'Bund' in Soviet Russia). --Soman (talk) 11:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuania AfD and sources[edit]

I started an AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Jewish Labour Bund in Lithuania, since there doesn't appear to be any reference indicating that there was a separate Bund party in Lithuania during the period 1917-1921. But I did find a mention in passing here[1], about Bundist presence in Kovno ghetto in the 1930s. Not sure however, if this would be still the Russian Bund (S.D.), perhaps the Polish Bund, a separate party or just a more informal tendency? Notably, the Bundist periodical Foroys issue XVIII (October 1957), has articles of potential interest - "Der Bund in Irushelayem De Litte" and "Der Bund in Kovner Litte". If anyone knows if possible to get hold of that issue online would be great. --Soman (talk) 14:37, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Samuel Schalkowsky (14 April 2014). The Clandestine History of the Kovno Jewish Ghetto Police: By Anonymous Members of the Kovno Jewish Ghetto Police. Indiana University Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-253-01297-5.

Question about "Bundism" Page[edit]

Is the Bundism page necessary, and can it be merged into this article? I understand this page discusses the Jewish Labour Bund as a whole, while "Bundism" discusses the ideology behind this group and its later iterations, but is that page necessary?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:General_Jewish_Labour_Bund&oldid=1207380420"