Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateur Writerz

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Amateur Writerz[edit]

I came across this little gem while cleaning up a substub (Amateur writing). It's a neat bit of adcopy, but utterly non-notable as the site's on free hosting and only has 20 stories. Sorry chaps, you'll have to do better than that.

And the moral of that is: go fix a substub today, it's very relaxing. humblefool ® 03:04, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

delete. Where does a personal webpage ad end and an enclyclopedic article about an established organisation begin? Obviously NOT HERE. At least they used the word "amatuer". Master Thief Garrett 03:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, advert. Megan1967 07:26, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete ad Dsmdgold 10:42, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
Delete ad. The page Self-publishing links to it. That should probably be edited out if the delete is made. Tobycat 00:59, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. It could be a very useful market for a beginning writer to look into. They're interested in publishing one of my pieces, in fact. The_Iconoclast 20:10, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Advert. Psychofox 23:34, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.