Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entonox
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was
Listed as a speedy deletion but is not a candidate for automatic deletion: does not meet any of the criteria. However the information contained within the article does appear to portray the information inaccurately if the note on the talk page is anything to go by. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 21:41, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Exists ([1], [2], [3]), and is useful. I'll try to add a bit more information. --Slowking Man 02:09, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge with Anaesthetic#The twentieth century (if applicable there.) Not sure if there'll be enough information to create more than a stub. --Ardonik.talk() 02:20, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Article is fine now. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:45, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- OK I'll go with keep as it is now. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 21:28, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.