User talk:Bonalaw

Welcome[edit]

Hello Bonalaw, welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions so far, especially the excellent article on BBC Choice.

I'm not sure you need them, but you might find these links helpful in editing pages or creating new ones: How to edit a page, Tutorial, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should probably read our policies at some point too.

But don't feel you have to read every policy document before you do anything. Dive in, be bold in editing, and if you do anything wrong, someone will be quick to correct it and let you know (hopefully, politely!)

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! -- ALargeElk | Talk 10:29, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Some more tips: Check out the Wikipedia:Manual of style. Write in complete sentences. To sign a comment in a talk page, just put four tildes, ~~~~, and it is automatically converted to your user name and the date. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 07:20, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Britney[edit]

Hi, Bonalaw.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thanks for expanding the Britney Spears trivia section. I'm so used to reverting vandalism on that page, that it was a surprise and a delight to find that someone had actually added something polished and informative!

chocolateboy 13:51, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Best selling singles by year[edit]

Hi! Just wrote an article on UK Best-selling singles by year, and then noticed you already have a link to it on your user page. Lucky I named it the same as you! Hope you don't mind I seem to have pinched a page you were going to do -- perhaps you can add to it if you know the ones before 1970... Smb1001 16:21, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

List of Number 1 Hits (UK)[edit]

Hello. Nice work on the List of Number 1 Hits (UK)! I'm interested to know what your source is. I have a complete list of all UK chart singles 1952-2002, but unfortunately it only gives the date each single entered the chart, and hence not the date a single reached number one. I'd be glad to fill in a few of the missing years if I had this information. --Auximines 10:14, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the information! I'll be happy to fill in at least 1978-1981 (my era!), but understand if you'd rather do it yourself, as it appears to be "your" project - let me know. --Auximines 10:42, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I've done 1977-1981. Hopefully I'll get round to writing short articles for some of the broken links. I've also done the remaining years, but since I'm not too familiar with anything after about 1980, I can't really proof-read it, so I leave that task to you. They're at User:Auximines/1983-1987, User:Auximines/1989-1991 and User:Auximines/1993-2003 - ready for you to check and then paste into the main article. --Auximines 14:35, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your corrections ![edit]

Thank you for having corrected my many mistakes in Yslaire. Unfortunately, English is not my mother tongue, but I feel that if I don't give my contribution to Franco-Belgian comics here, no one will make it. I'm looking for someone to check my English in every article. Could you please check the other articles I've typed ? Here they are :

Thanks !! Helldjinn 13:30, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hugh Laurie's "Mystery"[edit]

I want to keep the songs in List of songs that use the same rhyme throughout ordered by rhyme, yet I don't know what the recurring rhyme ending in Hugh Laurie's "Mystery" is. I've googled and googled for it, but I can't find references to a song by this name by Hugh Laurie anywhere. I was thrilled to have an addition to my list, but no one else on the Net seems to care enough about the song to post the lyrics!

[I don't know where to post this, but you can find the lyrics to "Mystery" here http://www.answers.com/topic/mystery-song ]

Oh, by the way, in my edit I'm going to add "Dancing in the Moonlight" by King Harvest. I can't believe no one thought of that song until now! Wiwaxia

Invite[edit]

Hi

I'm posting this to invite you to participate in WP:LCOTW , a project you may be interested in. Please consider nominating and/or voting for a suitable article there. Filiocht 12:26, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Jewish categories[edit]

Hi I noted your input in the Jewish lists so hopefully this will interest you. I started making a few new categories: Category:Jews in music, Category:Jews in science, and Category:Jews in the visual arts, however User:Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters has nominated all these for renaming due to his aversion to the phrase "Jews in". The reason I created the Jews in music category was because I knew Category:Jewish musicians and Category:Jewish music existed but mainly covered yiddish/religious music. I have persuaded Lulu to change the name of the current category to Jewish classical musicians (as this basically covers the people I had added to it) but I still feel a category such as Category:Jews in western music needs to be the parent category of all classical, pop, jazz, rock, musical sub categories to avoid confusion with yiddish music, Klezmer etc. I would appreciate your views on this here Talk:List_of_Jews#Jewish_categories Arnie587 23:32, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BBC One COW ident[edit]

Hi Bonalaw. Hope you don't mind but I've listed an image you uploaded last year Image:Bbc1cow.jpg for deletion. It's just that I uploaded Image:BBC-one-1985.jpg, the same image and decided that since it had a slightly more decriptive filename (only just ;) ) that it should replace your version. Sorry about that. Wikiwoohoo 18:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Bowles[edit]

Nice work by you on the Lynn Bowles article. It's nice to see how an article can mushroom from nothing to a genuine article in 15 minutes! Thuresson 12:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polygamy[edit]

Re: Your assertion on the talk page for St. Ives riddle: Polygamy is permitted in the UK, however the marriages must have been made (legally) in another country. Same goes for underage marriage. 131.111.202.113 23:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serious Amazon[edit]

Thanks for the great lead on the serious jungle article. I would like to see a little more about the other expeditions in separate articles, but this is a good start. Could you include Angelica Bell (did I spell that right?). She narrated the first series, perhaps a later one as well before Fearne came in. Also, I'm wrecking my brain to find the article on the Ashwan tribe which featured in Serious Amazon, but apparently I'm misspelling it. Do you know where I can find the Wikipedia article about them? - Mgm|^(talk) 08:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...He's a Waterfall[edit]

[1] - very, very good point! I'm surpised anyone had the gall to put that there!--Crestville 12:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signing AfD nominations and comments[edit]

Wikipedia:Etiquette asks contributors to sign their contributions on article Talk pages, etc. You can take this to mean that articles in places other than the articlespace should be attributed in order to demonstrate good etiquette. (aeropagitica) (talk) 13:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Zoom Spark[edit]

I see no references here. The style is awesome, but there needs to be some sort of external source to satisfy WP:N. If you would be so kind as to reference it, I won't have to nominate it for deletion. Nothing personal, just the rules. Callix

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wally1.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wally1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ch4logo.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ch4logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Countdown[edit]

Countdown (game show) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Replaceable fair use Image:Marcussbentley.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcussbentley.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 14:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Garth Marenghi[edit]

An editor has nominated Garth Marenghi, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garth Marenghi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AlwaysLookOnTheBrightSideOfLife.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlwaysLookOnTheBrightSideOfLife.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 06:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation on The Rutles (fictional history)[edit]

I noticed you were one of the early contributors to the [[2]] section of The Rutles page. This reads as a transcription of the narration of the film, and if it is such, it is a copyright violation. I've tagged the section and have made a note in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Rutles#Copyright_violation.3F_.28Their_History_.28Fictional.29.29 for the page. If you have any idea whether this section does represent a faithful (or near faithful) transcription, your contributions to the discussion would be welcome. If I'm wrong and this section is merely a retelling of the story of the Rutles without using the actual text from the film, then that would help clear up the question. Thanks. Acsenray (talk) 19:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:STRANGE1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:STRANGE1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —Remember the dot ^(talk) 17:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Diogenes Small[edit]

I have nominated Diogenes Small, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diogenes Small. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ←Spidern → 15:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Bonalaw! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jackie Genova - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sarah Manners - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lesley Judd - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rosemary Conley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Jan Stips - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Get Britain Back[edit]

The article Get Britain Back has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This party, coming off the back of Hylton-Pott's win of the TV programme "Vote For Me", was never notable. I can find only one item of press coverage for it in 2005:[3]. It stood only one candidate, Hylton-Potts, who received few votes, and otherwise there is no sign of activity, despite it still being registered in Great Britain.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fences&Windows 21:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Great pop things.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Great pop things.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Great pop things.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Great pop things.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Peckham[edit]

The article George Peckham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly non-notable and unimprovable engineer biography article as my searches found nothing better than a few links including some of the currently listed. Simply nothing else to suggest better notability and improvement to this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 07:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ian Catt for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Catt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Catt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 08:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death, Dungeons and Taxes Party for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death, Dungeons and Taxes Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death, Dungeons and Taxes Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. doktorb _words^deeds 01:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Time (British TV programme)[edit]

The article Time (British TV programme) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2019

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]