Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed's law

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. PoccilScript 01:15, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Ed's law[edit]

Suspect neologism. Note created by User:Edgod. Rmhermen 17:29, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)

delete Author admits to this offsite[1]Geni 17:32, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Can even be a speedy under the patent nonsense criteria Glaurung 17:53, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete sub-nonsense.
Delete, not notable, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 00:38, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete with extreme prejudice; stealth vanity. —Korath (Talk) 01:31, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.