Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 plus 2
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:28, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
2 plus 2[edit]
note: has now been redirected per Flamurai's work below, keep as redir Wolfman 03:50, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
just silly. Wolfman 00:23, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this so-called principle of theirs is meaningless without a proof. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:28, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't understand these higher mathematics, so delete. Carrp | Talk 00:45, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I thought this was going to be about the poker book publisher, actually. – flamurai (t) 01:46, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
- hmmm, that might make a reasonable replacement article. any poker fans out there? Wolfman 01:51, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I think the publishing company is officially Two Plus Two Publishing rather than 2 plus 2, but if someone ever writes that article, this could be a redirect. – flamurai (t) 02:14, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
- hmmm, that might make a reasonable replacement article. any poker fans out there? Wolfman 01:51, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, no redirect. Megan1967 09:00, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep redirect to prevent recreation. Grue 11:59, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.