Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jedi and sith ranks

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 13:04, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Jedi and sith ranks[edit]

Much of the information presented here is apparently fan material courtesy of supershadow.com not to mention that all avaliable information on jedi and sith ranks are already covered in the respective articles on Jedi and Sith. I for one would think this article should be deleted. Timon 18:53, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - information here is more detailed than that on jedi/sith pages. eg shows more jedi ranks. Or perhaps updated Jedi/Sith pages with full rank listing? --Sgkay 19:24, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The information listed in the said article is also entirely false having being extracted from a source known for its lack of truthfulness. Timon 20:21, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete SuperShadow has a long, LONG history of bullcrap. Misleading false info. --InShaneee 21:08, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mcfly85 22:39, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original research, maybe complete fabrication. --Carnildo 22:50, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Stancel 01:20, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN. This is entirely fake, but come on. Sith ranked "Whatazor"? Classic. A Man In Black 01:42, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN, agreed classic. Megan1967 06:51, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no objection to BJAODN but I don't find this particularly funny. — Phil Welch 22:52, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.