Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal latrines

Article Royal latrines listed on WP:VFD May 1 to May 7 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

Makes no sense whatsoever, google does not yield anything for "royal latrines"

Delete -- Cyrius|&#9998 21:42, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
I had initally deleted this as nonsense, but then restored it, and by the time I came here to list it, it was already listed. :) Delete. RickK 21:43, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This edit [1] by the anon who created Royal latrines suggests it could be vandalism. Andris 22:12, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
Delete, patent nonsense. Ungrammatical patent nonsense at that. TB 22:36, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Chris 73 | (New) Talk 01:06, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dubious factoid, POV writing, not easily verifiable, no references cited. Dpbsmith 01:21, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ditto, ditto, and ditto. Alcarillo 15:42, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is too stupid to even be allowed to exist. How about speedy delete? - Lucky 6.9 18:15, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

End discussion