Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deficit hawk

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Article defaults to "keep". Joyous 00:38, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)

Deficit hawk[edit]

Dicdef, and I can't think of how it could be made encyclopedic. Maybe move to wiktionary if it's a common enough term, though I've never heard it. Madame Sosostris 06:42, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I have; transwiki to wiktionary. Samaritan 07:06, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Transwiki. Megan1967 02:40, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Politicians often center their campaigns around budget "crises". This just needs to be expanded. CPS 23:45, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep, the term is used, needs expansion. Wyss 08:36, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.