Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Daniel Macarro

Daniel Macarro[edit]

I believe this would be a great article to be featured. It shows that Wikipedia has article of articualte nature, and ones that are interesting to read. Also, the article itself if of a humble, not too well-known man, which is exactly what Wikipeida needs! 67.202.156.84 (talk · contribs)

Object. This article is: too short, has many spelling errors, and almost qualifies as a bio-stub. Unless there is a massive touch-up, expansion, and a photo added, this is an easy no-vote. Also, the FAC tag seems to have been added to get back at whovere listed the article in VfD. Remember, don't disrupt to Wikipedia to make your point.Harro5 22:16, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Object 1) there is no lead section. 2) there are no references. 3) there are no images. 4) this article is a candidate for deletion. slambo 23:33, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Object. A downright preposterous listing. The article is quite poor and, in any case, there's no evidence he's notable enough to have an article in the first place. Everyking 01:48, 14 May 2005 (UTC) (edited by Harro5 to specifically include Object)[reply]
Object, check the edit history, and see how the current version differs from the original version. This article is a hoax. There is nothing on Google in any language which verifies the existence of this person. RickK 07:47, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- The authors of the page - a couple of anons - have admitted this article is a fake (see unsigned ""deletes" near bottom), and so I would request someone close down this vote. Harro5 21:30, May 14, 2005 (UTC)