Talk:Timer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Timer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Candle#Timekeeping|Candle-timers]] The anchor (#Timekeeping) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

"Timer" instead of "A timer"[edit]

why does the page start with "Timer" instead of "A timer"? Is there a reason for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hero of Milk (talk • contribs) 16:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A typical mechanical timer (76 years)[edit]

what on earth does (76 years) mean on the caption of this picture? I mean, is the timer 76 years old? could someone who understands what the caption means fix it or something? jussaying — Preceding unsigned comment added by TSBoncompte (talk • contribs) 20:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opening heading[edit]

software timers ? imagine some application scheduler (high priority thread) which keeps list of running (started) timers and calls hooks supplied by the application when timer expires see also http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/larytet/emLIB/AOS/aosTimer.h?rev=1.1&view=markup

Electronic timer[edit]

Why aren't analogue electronic timers included in the article? Although not accurate a simple RC ckt along with a BJT can act as a timer... Rohitbd 14:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You mean quartz analog timers like [1]? I might as well go ahead and fix it. [|Retro00064 | (talk/contribs) |] 05:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Egg timer should be merged into this article[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to merge. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC) I have noticed that there are two Wikipedia articles on timers: Timer, this article, and Egg timer, the article that needs to be merged into this one. The articles seem to have a bit of overlap. This article could easily have a section entitled "Egg timers" that gives detailes about true "egg timers" (timers that have a maximum setting of 3 minutes) and the fact that people often incorrectly call regular kitchen timers (timers that have a maximum setting of more than 3 minutes) "egg timers". The 2 articles don't even link to each other. To create some consistency, the aticles should be merged. I can already imagine what the merged article would look like. [|Retro00064 | (talk/contribs) |] 04:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bad idea--76.116.105.50 (talk) 02:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a good idea. The Egg timer article isn't very big, and has some bad pictures now. I am adding some pictures to the timer article, and agree with your idea of merging Hustvedt (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's about time I got around to this! I'm going to try to merge the articles soon, and then I will try to get the article listed at WikiProject Time. [|Retro00064 | (talk/contribs) |] 05:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Merge. I was looking for basic timers and entered 'timers' in Google. It gave me the Wiki site, where I expected to see candle-timers, water-timers, sand-timers and egg-timers etc. as well as more modern timers. But all of these were missing! Please merge! Or, if the egg-timer article is huge, at least put a brief mention of them on the 'timer' page, and then put a link to the full article. --Observer29 (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i dont think egg timers should put in cos they are the same as a mechanical timer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.60.223.194 (talk) 09:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Egg timer be merged into Hourglass instead? Alksentrs (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent idea. True 'egg timers' are actually just a type of hourglass. [|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 23:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the merge notion. Not all 3-minute egg-timers are types of hourglasses. Few hourglasses are egg-timers set to exactly 3 minutes. The size is obviously radically different, but more importantly, the environment (setting) is completely different. --Connel MacKenzie - wikt 23:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Interval timer project work[edit]

Explain 102.89.45.75 (talk) 17:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Motivation is the key[edit]

You lose You win 49.206.52.199 (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

clock[edit]

genrations of clock 112.196.145.173 (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]