Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critch's Law

Critch's Law

Considering that this "law" was made in response to a post made on FARK today, I doubt that it has enough widespread importance to warrant an article. --Cvaneg 20:26, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Lost/widowed VfD nomination. delete. Cool Hand Luke 01:54, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete--Josiah 03:49, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete 'law'-vanity. --fvw* 11:59, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
• Agree with User:Cvaneg. "Delete'. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 15:15, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete or speedy delete. Geogre 17:34, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Not a real law. Jeff Knaggs 17:42, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 07:12, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, with the way things spread on the Internet, it will probably become a well-known term. Keep it on wikipedia to show this encyclopedia is ahead of everyone else. -- Crevaner 11:05, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - Crevaner has a point. -- Old Right 11:24, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Note to admins: keep in mind that User:Old Right is a sock puppet of User:Crevaner and both are trolls. Wile E. Heresiarch 08:18, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)