Talk:Sabrina the Teenage Witch

Comics Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

List of Sabrina the Teenage Witch books, CDs and DVDs was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 June 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Sabrina the Teenage Witch. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Untitled[edit]

I need a witch book pls!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.213.201.127 (talk) 03:46, 18 March 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Time travel television series[edit]

"Category:Time travel television series" is a newly-created category. There is a discussion over how much "time travel" should occur in a series before it should be included in this category. Please join the discussion in that category's discussion. Val42 19:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manga[edit]

I think that this section need to be greatly expanded since Tania del Rio has given it a continuity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.149.97.50 (talk) 02:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help writing an article about the spin-offs and crossovers of this series[edit]

I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 17:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters[edit]

A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sit-Com versus original comic book character[edit]

Large sections of this article (e.g. characters) have been written by a fan of the live action TV show, retroactively being applied incorrectly to the comic book and cartoon. Perhaps the original character should have her own article separate from the TV show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.141.161 (talk) 21:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original Cartoon[edit]

It seems bizarre that absolutely no one remembers that between the comic book and the live-action TV show was a Saturday morning Sabrina The Teenage Witch cartoon that ran for four seasons on CBS beginning in 1970! Buy the whole series here! http://www.amazon.com/Sabrina-Teenage-Witch-Complete-Animated/dp/B00125WAY6 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.100.166.184 (talk) 21:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Sabrina the Teenage Witch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oddballcomics.com/article.php?story=2007-04-02
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040711035502/http://www.archiecomics.com/acpaco_offices/askthearchivist/ask_june.htm to http://www.archiecomics.com/acpaco_offices/askthearchivist/ask_june.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Publication History[edit]

Shouldn't this section include the "Chilling Adventures of Sabrina" comic series? Currently the only mention of that is in the paragraph about the TV show based on it. It seems to be notable, after all it has its own WP entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chilling_Adventures_of_Sabrina — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.202.33.17 (talk) 04:42, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 April 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. Per WP:NCTV and a broad consensus here, a franchise page should be at the base title . There is currently not one, but the current comics article seems broadly adequate for the purpose. There's no consensus that the dab page is the best choice for readers. No such user (talk) 13:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sabrina the Teenage Witch → Sabrina the Teenage Witch (comics) – Not primary per pageviews; see Sabrina the Teenage Witch (1996 TV series). Move dab page to main title 162.208.168.92 (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)—Relisted. 2pou (talk) 18:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). 162.208.168.92 (talk) 04:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No primary topic. And move Sabrina the Teenage Witch (disambiguation) to Sabrina the Teenage Witch. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Page views aren't everything. This is the closest thing we have to a standalone franchise article (see WP:NCTV#Media franchise). It acts as a WP:CONCEPTDAB, effectively linking to all the spin-offs in other media. -- Netoholic @ 22:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This could be reworked to be a franchise article, with a split of the comics in their own standalone article. As it reads today, however, that's not the case. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also note that a disambiguation page is also a great way to link to all spin-offs in other media. Josie and the Pussycats is a fitting comparable. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Netoholic. What would people prefer, the origin of the franchise or a DAB page? I would hazard a guess it's not the latter. Nohomersryan (talk) 19:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support readers prefer choice which is why WP:NOPRIMARY exists - they can read (comics) and (1996 TV series) in Google results if we let them. It's not our job to push them at the comics. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23% of page views can't be primary on a popular culture topic In ictu oculi (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The comic is not the primary given the popularity of the TV show. Rreagan007 (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The basename should really be a franchise article. Sabrina the Teenage Witch is already somewhat close to that, with its sizable "In other media" section. But given that a true franchise article doesn't yet exist, I'm sort of neutral on this move. I think it's probably not much better or worse than the current setup, in terms of efficiently getting readers to where they want to go. Colin M (talk) 00:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sabrina the Teenage Witch → Sabrina the Teenage Witch (comics) and also support Sabrina the Teenage Witch (disambiguation) → Sabrina the Teenage Witch per nomination, Rreagan007 and In ictu oculi. There are 11 entries listed at the Sabrina the Teenage Witch (disambiguation) page, thus confirming that Sabrina the Teenage Witch (comics) is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over the combined prominence of Sabrina the Teenage Witch (film), Sabrina the Teenage Witch (1970 TV series), Sabrina the Teenage Witch (1996 TV series) and the remaining seven entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though agreed that there could be a separate WP:CONCEPTDAB page. Natg 19 (talk) 08:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think it should be moved but if it is I think a franchise article should take it's place.–Collinanderson (talk) 10:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.