Category talk:Monarchs

Biography: Royalty and Nobility Category‑class

	Biography portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This category is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Politics Category‑class

	Politics portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This category was nominated for merging on 18 May 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Notes[edit]

I think my Category:Japanese emperors outrank your monarchs. Can I still add it to this category? ;-) Chris 73 | Talk 07:55, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Of course - and, anyway, we include the Indian Emperor (and Empress) by virtue of British monarchs... :-)

James F. (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... categories are interesting. I think it's clear that not all queens are monarchs, and some monarchs are neither king, queen, empress, nor emperor. My question: are there any Kings that are not monarchs? Deposed ones I suppose, if they still count as kings..any other examples? - Nunh-huh 23:24, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

There are king-consorts, like Francisco of Spain, Fernando II of Portugal, etc. john k 20:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup tag[edit]

There needs to be a better naming convention for subcategories. Also, given the clutter here, shouldn't there be a "Monarchs by country" subcategory? -- Beland 06:29, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

A mess[edit]

It is a total mess that there is a Category:Kings and a Category:Monarchs. Surely this can be dealt with. john k 20:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kings has since been nominated for merging several times, but retained each time. Partly because there are emirs, emperors, etc. -- Beland (talk) 17:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]