Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Vandalism in Progress)
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 00:46 on 22 May 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Reports[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
- 49.184.240.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported[edit]
- 178.113.65.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Flagcruft LTA. Loafiewa (talk) 22:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 8.48.3.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Floridly racist, antisemite, etc 1 2 3 Mlkj (talk) 23:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses used by Wikipedia users. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 23:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2A00:23EE:2418:718:B81C:E698:CC3A:8BF7 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Political views of J. K. Rowling (diff): vandalism after final warning. Blanking, non-neutral additions and disruptive edit summaries. Warnings ignored. DanielRigal (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 2A00:23EE:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 00:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- You could also, you know, try collaboratively editing instead of just blanking my addition to the page and then whining about it here when I put them back. I'm trying to balance the introductory section because at the moment it is very biased as well as being unreferenced. Consider that please, if you will 2A00:23EE:2418:718:B81C:E698:CC3A:8BF7 (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. You are not. You know that you are not. You are adding deeply inappropriate, non-neutral wording and then engaging in retaliatory blanking when you don't get your way. If you know enough about Wikipedia to find your way here then you know that what you are doing is wrong. In fact, that suggests prior experience which might indicate sockpuppetry. DanielRigal (talk) 00:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop trying to gaslight me with your nonsense. If you were acting in good faith here then you would be attempting to collaboratively edit to improve this part of the article rather than blanking out an addition you didn't like. We both know that you are trying to keep this as a hit piece against JK Rowling, your own user page gives away your biases. Now please either work with me respectfully on this or leave this article alone and let me get on with improving it. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:2418:718:B81C:E698:CC3A:8BF7 (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. You are not. You know that you are not. You are adding deeply inappropriate, non-neutral wording and then engaging in retaliatory blanking when you don't get your way. If you know enough about Wikipedia to find your way here then you know that what you are doing is wrong. In fact, that suggests prior experience which might indicate sockpuppetry. DanielRigal (talk) 00:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)