Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Livengood

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 20:38, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Stephen Livengood

not notable, unless we consider a national ranking at Magic:The Gathering notable. DJ Clayworth 17:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

As a long time follower of Steve, I think his Magic: The Gathering ranking speaks for itself. Any game with a million dollar protour deserves recognition. Also, changing someone's post (as was done to yours) to suit your needs is childish.Robinsonbp1@gcc.edu B. Robinson

• Delete Magic: The Gathering gets a lot of Google hits, but not Stephen Livengood. Mwanner 18:04, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
• At the least, a person should be able to support themself by playing their game. Kai Budde, for example, clearly deserves an article. This guy does not. Anyone who can earn a living only through cards, I would say, deserves an article, or at least a merge and redirect to a list; this only gets a delete vote. Sorry. Meelar (talk) 19:27, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not sufficiently notable for winning regional tourneys or having a national ranking. If he were the sole World Champion in a given year, that would barely make the edge of WP-worthiness by my tastes; I'd rather have world champs in a table in the game's main article, not their own bios. I know several former World Champions of Diplomacy (game), but I don't think they're notable enough to have articles here. Barno 19:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I'm curious as to what his ranking actually is, but since it's not mentioned I doubt it's noteworthy. Delete Mgm|^(talk) 20:27, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete MTGcruft. Klonimus 03:59, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, lots of people have national rankings - it means you participate in tourneys. Unless you actually win a lot (per Kai Budde) your article would be WP:VAIN. Radiant_* 08:15, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.