Talk:Microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulator

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in May, 2004. The result of that discussion was to keep the article. For an archive of the discussion, see /Delete.

iffy bit[edit]

This bit's a bit dubious:

The theory elaborated by Pierre Mathieu a Victoria Biomechanics specialist and TCM practitionner, was that the MENS is running one order of magnitude closer to the body's actual currents of only a few picoamps (pA) which are one millionth of a microamp itself one millionth of an Amp! The stimulation therefore is more in coherence with the body's own circuitry. The issue has been that generating stable square wave currents at microamp levels is already a challenge... but the real acting factor may actually be the magnetic fields generated by those currents which would equate with those conveyed by the metal needles employed in acupuncture.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517152938/http://www.frequencyspecific.com/papers/LumbarPainJBMT.pdf to http://www.frequencyspecific.com/papers/LumbarPainJBMT.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]