Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonecutters Guild

Stonecutters Guild

Stonecutters Guild was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

• Delete.* I've no idea what this is about. Some sort of gamecruft? Or a satire on the influence of the masons? P Ingerson 23:32, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• I just created the page five minutes ago! Its not complete yet, I just added the first line in about us to make you happy. . . we are a guild in Wurm Online http://www.wurmonline.com
• I think they're trying to build a home page for their online guild, but this is the wrong place for that... Kappa 23:46, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, promotional. Whenever you create a new page, it says clearly at the top "Please do not create an article to promote yourself, a website, a product, or a business (see Wikipedia:Policy)." And Wikipedia is not a free Wiki host or webspace provider; see Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:55, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. What Dpbsmith said. Inspired by the Stonecutters, who are arguably better known. JRM 23:59, 2004 Dec 26 (UTC)
• Delete: for reasons already given. DCEdwards1966 01:15, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, promotional/vanity. Rje 01:18, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Death to cruft. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:33, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete what everyone above me said, but doubled. Tuf-Kat 02:57, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Can {copyvio} articles be VfDed? Wurm Online is a self-proclaimed 'alpha test' MMORPG that only gets about 900 hits and an Alexa rank greater that 500K, so I don't think it really needs an article (yet, anyway--a few years and who knows). Niteowlneils
• Delete not because it's cruft, but because it's vanity. Bryan 16:16, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, it's an ad, basically. Wyss 22:32, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete blatantly unencyclopaedic. Xtra 09:44, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a Simpsons reference, if you didn't know. Yes, blatant advert. Luigi30 03:37, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree with Dpbsmith. Mrwojo 19:18, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.