Talk:Nine Lives (Aerosmith album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would like to point out that the bonus track versions in the article list the title of #14 as "Fallin' Angles" whereas the original title is "Fallen Angels". I don't know if this is an intentional misspelling on the actual bonus track version of the album, or just a typo during the writing of this article. Someone should look into this. --Crimson Bleeding Souls (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The final picture is included in the first, creating an infinite loop[edit]

The art of the cover not is a infinity loop, the last image is a draw of the band like a Zombies when Steven hold in your hand a draw of the Previous image. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.225.163.112 (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is an infinite loop in the alternative cover version of the album. But in the original album cover there is no loop. 86.45.241.154 (talk) 06:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Nine Lives" reference?[edit]

I didn't want to include it on the article, but is the album title a reference to how immortal the band is/will be? I mean, I know that Tyler & Perry were once known as the "Toxic Twins" for taking so many drugs that would've killed anyone else (along with Tyler falling offstage a few years back. Didn't exactly land on his feet literally, but he recovered), and that they've been going since 1973, even almost getting the tragic aircraft that killed several members of Lynyrd Skynyrd in 1977 after Skynyrd's Street Survivors and during Aerosmith's Rocks tour in Germany. 65.87.60.231 (talk) 23:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Outtakes[edit]

Where did the 'Outtakes' tab and information go? Docguy89 (talk) 21:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Away? FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 18:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Nine Lives (Aerosmith album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nine Lives (Aerosmith album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original cover[edit]

The addition of the original cover does not seem to meet WP:NFCCP, specifically criterion 8, as the text discussing the cover is barely a couple sentences long and is fairly self explanatory. Ellokk (talk) 06:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is sourced critical commentary about the original cover making it pass WP:NFCC#8. I have added it back into the article, if there is a future consensus here it can be removed or it can be taken to WP:FFD. Aspects (talk) 23:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how a few sentences that do not even constitute a section of the article can be considered critical commentary or pass WP:NFCC's 8, particularly when it is self explanatory and the mentioned subjects are linked to articles with free images. Ellokk (talk) 04:08, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is no consensus to remove the original cover image, so please stop doing that. You may try another avenue (alluded to above) if you're insistent. Two Hearted River (paddle / fish) 10:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Might I argue that, in any case, the original cover should be the one at the top of the article; the knife throwing cover, while the "official" artwork now (and I think should be kept too, albeit in the alternate cover section), ultimately marks a re-release. It wasn't what anyone was buying in March or April 1997.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is my position as well. Ellokk has reverted such edits but not made an argument against it. Two Hearted River (paddle / fish) 20:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the Genre "pop metal" to this album and songs[edit]

Hi!

Just wanting to make sure I can add the genre "Pop metal" to the albums genre's. Referenced in this article by Loudwire

"The very definition of beating a dead horse, 2001’s ‘Push Play’ was Aerosmith’s fifth straight exercise in the sort of widescreen pop metal inaugurated by ‘Permanent Vacation"

Read More: Aerosmith Albums Ranked | https://loudwire.com/aerosmith-albums-ranked/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral

This change has already been added to 'Just Push Play' wiki article. AgentKozak (talk) 18:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly doesn't have as much pop metal as Get a Grip, but it can't be denied that it's a part of the album, so if that's what the source says, I have no problem. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 20:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nine_Lives_(Aerosmith_album)&oldid=1211289673"