Talk:Rohonczi Codex

	Writing portal This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unrecognized Türcic or Tataric dialect? ... an opinion by Mart Vabar[edit]

The writing systems with old "Turcic runes" are pretty democratic. The visual shape of glyphs may change a lot, too. Just look at these links:

http://sophistikatedkids.com/turkic/31Alphabet/BaichorovTable72En.htm

http://sophistikatedkids.com/turkic/31Alphabet/KyzlasovIL%20En.htm

Could Rohonczi Codex make one more column in these tables?

Why not venetic variation http://users.tpg.com.au/etr/etrusk/po/venetic.html considering the Venetian origin.

PS

If anybody is interested in this book, he should regard also at the Voynich Manuscript.

Doubtful sources[edit]

Here is the text from the last edit before revertion:

2 other pages http://www.intellact.com/o.jpg and reading of this http://www.intellact.com/72.wav

Another ocurences of dragolica writing system http://kabardians.com/gallery/script1.jpg there are other shorter description on, gold vase now at Hermitage, silver digout from Ukraina.

Anyway, the links he provided seem really doubtful. Still, I tried checking it out. A google search on "Dragolica" truned up nothing.

Hahh realy

And the root site of his third link is some kind of horse site. Will anyone shed some light on this? Cal 1234 05:02, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

and What the hourse did say ????? :)

What to do in case like this ? In mather almost nobody understand evrything appers to be doubtful. Just is by definition of the word doubtful. Check the meaning of the word http://www.answers.com/doubtfoul&r=67 Google is not searching yet all old sources so ... wait and please be more patient. The mater is at least few hundred yars old and nobody criticaly thinking will expect to get all references in single google search. Is it?

Wikipedia has a policy of no original research -- that we should only post information that was published in respectable sources, such as books, scientific journals, etc. I assume yours is not, therefore it is doubtful.Bogdan | Talk 09:11, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia should be based on NPOV. Your sense is Your point of view. Do you need a research paper to see what is obviously similar? re: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rohonczi_Codex&oldid=10649732. That is as much as is given for now - who wana get more??. Read this codex by hart, and in oposite direction:) or turn the book upside down :))) "Mądrej głowie dość dwie słowie".

It's all about sensitivity, when someone sense cannot sense essence.

Rohoncz is the little town Rechnitz, in Austria !

Source: Location: Rechnitz (Austria) X: 1830100m Y: 5960700m Lat: 47:18:20N (47.3056) Lon: 16:26:25E (16.4404) Web Address: www.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?lat=47.3056&lon=16.4404&scale=20000000&icon=x

S.D., 09.02.2005

That is true. However, in 1907 it was part of Hungary. Only after WWI, it passed to Austria. However I'll mention it in the article. Bogdan | Talk 07:15, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Gusztav's Library[edit]

It would be interesting to know the entire content of Batthyány's library which was donated to the academy, if a record was kept. That may even give us a clue. Alexander 007 09:11, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely, the full records are at the Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. (Arany János utca 1, Budapest, near Saint Stephen's Basilica) I did a search on their catalog and found that three books have the comment: "Prov.: Batthyány 1" :

Commentarii absolutissimi ad titulum digestorum de verborum obligationibus / Hugo Donellus, Francofurti, 1599
Commentarii absolutissimi ad II. III. IV. VI. et VIII. libros codicis Justinianei / Hugo Donellus ; maxima fere ex parte posthumi ... a Jacobo Schegkio ... publicati, Francofurti, 1599
Petrus Albinus, Meissnische Land und Berg-Chronica, Dressden, 1589

bogdan ʤjuʃkə | ^Talk 11:25, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking about writing a letter to the academy. Even though the inventory might not give us a clue (or if it does, we might not recognize it), it is at least a possibility, and there aren't many other leads in this case. Alexander 007 11:39, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the mailing address:

Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences

H-1245 Budapest, Pf. 1002.

Hungary

From what I've seen in Budapest, Hungarians are rarely good at speaking foreign languages, so writing in Hungarian would be a plus :-) bogdan ʤjuʃkə | ^Talk 11:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

German is somewhat widely spoken, but at the Academy of Sciences I am sure everyone speaks at least two foreign languages (requirement to getting a diploma). --80.98.38.69 11:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I can't manage that Hungarian writing on my own, I might have a friend help me. It will only be a few sentences anyway. I'll probably just write it in English if I write it. Alexander 007 12:29, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External link[edit]

I studied the Codex from Rohonc extensively. Since I put all my findings on a site, I ask the administrators of this page to take a look at my blog and put an external link to it, if they think it is worth it. I think it has additional information and would be interesting for anybody who is researching the Codex. I tried to do this myself but I understand this violates the Wikipedia policies. Not my intention. So please, take a look http://rohonczcodex.wordpress.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.101.65.35 (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]