Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Livonia Mall

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 20:20, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Livonia Mall

Delete. Article does not provide more information than title. It's a mall, it's in Livonia. FreplySpang (talk) 20:41, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• article manages to establish NON-NOTABILITY. This mall is frequently shopped at. It has been around for several decades and at one time, was a unique shopping mall. I would guess that the origin of this article is the link to Livona Mall in the Livonia, Michigan article. I'm going to pre-emptively yank another mall redlink to prevent further silliness. BigFatDave 22:30, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, "unique" makes it notable. Kappa 23:48, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Er ... how, exactly? I'm unique. As are you. Uncle G 01:17, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
    • If it was "unique" in that sense, it would still be so. Kappa 03:20, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • My confusion is stemming from the fact that it isn't apparent to me from the text of the article in what sense the mall actually was unique. The article baldly states the mall was, at one time, unique. It doesn't say how it was unique. Is it merely saying that it was, at one time, the only shopping mall in Livonia, Michigan? Or was it unique for some other reason (such as, say, being the only shopping mall painted bright fluorescent orange throughout)? Uncle G 04:07, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
    • As I suspected, it was unique at least in the sense that "at one time, was the only shopping mall in Livonia". Kappa 22:31, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Perhaps your vote should be discounted on the grounds that it makes absolutely no sense. Gamaliel 01:23, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, The mall is worth making an article about, I am sure google will find results about it. Just do more google testing to find out if it is a keeper. --SuperDude 00:47, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No notability established. If this mall truly deserves an article, there wouldn't be any big loss if the current article were deleted – the description there could be applied to just about any American mall. android↔talk 02:15, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. notability. Mikkalai 03:58, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 05:11, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Isn't it strange how SuperDude115 stepped in to put in a "keep" vote on yet another SamuraiClinton Michigan nanostub...? Lucky smells socks. - Lucky 6.9 07:24, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral. I tried adding something to it to make it not just a redundant "generic mall" label, but I agree there's not much reason to keep it now (other than Wikipedia is not paper), so I'm counting on people who live around there to add to it. It does serve a city of a 100,000, after all. -- Natalinasmpf 17:30, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, screamingly non-notable. Slac speak up! 01:21, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Malls are generally non-notable. Gamaliel 01:23, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Maybe make a mention in Livonia, Michigan and delete - Skysmith 08:54, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Another mall? Delete them all. The world's that small. Now curtain, fall. Radiant_* 13:55, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
• If Skysmith wants to mention this in the Livonia, MI article, we can redirect to Livonia, MI. Otherwise just keep if you find more intriguing details. --SuperDude 03:43, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • You already voted. android↔talk 03:49, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Notability not established. Jonathunder 04:12, 2005 Apr 19 (UTC)
• Delete. Inconsequential. Postdlf 09:08, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Pavel Vozenilek 02:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.