Talk:Pedophile movement/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

boylover and girllover. They're... hmm... Dicdefs, yeah, that's what they are, and I don't see much of an article coming from them. - Fennec 23:22, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• Keep. They both get plenty of Google hits (352K and 11K, respectively), and I can't think of anywhere else that the content might be appropriate. There's room for expansion beyond just a definition, although it would be nice if there were some way to merge the two... -- Seth Ilys
• Keep. The current discussion of pedophilia struggles to be even one-dimensional. Unless Wikipedia sees itself as a moral arbiter (not likely, given (JOKE, --Patrick 10:03, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)) List of porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay), both should stay. Denni 01:35, 2004 Mar 30 (UTC)
  • What's with the <font color="#000066"><u>Porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay</u></font>? - Fennec 01:37, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • Fake link. Less baiting than List of porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay. Of course, we could go List of porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay and just confuse the hell out of everyone. Denni
      • I know that's what it's supposed to be, but why? =D Fennec 14:58, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Delete - I just don't see encyclopedia articles coming from these. -- Cyrius | (talk) 03:27, Mar 30, 2004 (UTC)
• Redirect to pedophile or some similar article. Saul Taylor 04:04, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • I agree. Redirect. These appear to be alternative opinions on pedophilia. MK 06:48, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• A little more has been added to the article. About differences according to research. Mike
• The words doesn't mean the same as pedophiles, so the article is needed. W!
• Redirect, these are primarily euphemisms used by pedophiles to describe themselves. They should be discussed in pedophilia, but don't warrant separate articles. --Michael Snow 22:16, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • I agree with Michael Snow. These are terms that pedophiles use for themselves. Perhaps they don't act upon their fantasies or perhaps they act on them and consider a child to be consenting in some situations, but it's still pedophilia. --Sonjaaa 17:01, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)
• Agree to redirect. This is POV and the terms should be discussed in a subheading of the more commonly accepted term pedophilia. Ashibaka ✎ 20:36, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep both. They appear to be concepts distinct from the purely sexual definition given at paedophilia, so a merge there seems inappropriate. Looks as though there's ample historic and psychological material available on non-sexual attraction to children. Jamesday 15:17, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• (moved from a deleted MediaWiki:VfD-Boylover) Don't delete. Re-direct to boyfriend. 66.32.73.77 17:32, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)